Communicated on 19 November 2015

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 26220/07 Yuriy Vasilyevich CHANOV against Russia and 16 other applications (see list appended)

The applicants are Russian nationals. The applicants ’ details are tabulated in the Appendix.

A. The circumstances of the cases

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

1. Application no. 26220/07

The application was lodged on 19 May 2007 by Mr Yuriy Vasilyevich Chanov who was born on 26 June 2007 and lives in Tyumen. He is represented by Ms L. Blinova, a lawyer practicing in Tyumen.

On 20 October 2006 at 3.40 p.m. a man was heavily injured in the applicant ’ s flat. At 4 p.m. the applicant was arrested and brought to a police station. It appears that the police officers questioned him and then fined him for an administrative offence of living without a residence registration. According to the applicant, after the questioning he remained in the corridor of the police station with the exit closed by a grid door.

On 21 October 2006 at 3 p.m. a criminal investigation into a criminal offence of causing heavy injuries was opened. At 5 p.m. the applicant ’ s arrest record was drawn.

On 23 October 2006 the Leninskiy District Court of Tyumen authorised the applicant ’ s detention. On 28 November 2006 the Tyumen Regional Court upheld the decision. The courts did not address the applicant ’ s arguments about his unrecorded detention and belated – outside of the forty ‑ eight hours ’ statutory time-limit – court authorisation of his detention.

The applicant complained to a court about his unlawful detention from 20 to 23 October 2006. On 7 November 2006 the District Court rejected the complaint as unsubstantiated. On 21 December 2006 the Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal.

2. Application no. 26417/07

The application was lodged on 8 May 2007 by Mr Andrey Dmitriyevich Kashitsin who was born on 11 November 1969 and lives in Izhevsk, Republic of Udmurtia.

On 22 January 2007 the applicant was arrested in Saratov. On 24 January 2007 he was transferred to the town of Mozhga. At 3.30 p.m. his arrest record was drawn.

On 25 January 2007 the Mozhguinskiy Town Court of the Republic of Udmurtia ordered the applicant ’ s detention. On 8 February 2007 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Udmurtia upheld the detention order.

On 23 March 2007 the Town Court extended the applicant ’ s detention until 24 April 2007. The applicant appealed complaining, in particular, that he had been actually arrested on 22 January 2007. On 10 April 2007 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant ’ s appeal.

On 11 July 2007 the Town Court convicted the applicant and sentenced him to a prison term of one year and six months, running from 22 January 2007. On 31 July 2007 the Town Court clarified its judgment, stating that the applicant ’ s prison term had to be counted since 22 January 2007, the date of his actual arrest.

3. Application no. 7814/08

The application has been lodged on 23 December 2007 by Mr Sergey Ivanovich Masyukov who was born on 6 June 1975 and lives in Vorontsovka, Omsk region.

On 23 September 2004 the applicant was arrested and brought to a police station. On 24 September 2004 the applicant was questioned as a witness in a murder investigation.

It appears that on 24 September 2004 the applicant was charged with an administrative offence of disorderly conduct, but the administrative proceedings were not pursued.

On 27 September 2004 at 9.55 p.m. the applicant ’ s arrest record was drawn. On 28 September 2004 the Tsentralnyy District Court of Omsk authorised the applicant ’ s detention.

On 1 November 2006 the Omsk Regional Court convicted the applicant of theft, robbery and murder and sentenced him to twenty years ’ imprisonment, running from 23 September 2007, the date of the actual arrest. On 19 December 2007 the Supreme Court of Russia upheld the conviction on appeal.

On 27 June 2005 the applicant sought criminal prosecution of policemen for his unlawful detention and alleged ill-treatment from 23 to 27 September 2004. His request was refused on 7 July 2005. The applicant challenged the refusal before a court. On 28 January and 22 April 2010 the Tsentralnyy District Court of Omsk and the Omsk Regional Court respectively rejected his action. Both courts considered the police officers ’ actions as lawful and the allegations of ill-treatment as unsubstantiated.

The applicant also unsuccessfully claimed damages for his unlawful detention. On 24 February and 27 July 2011 the Pervomayskiy District Court of Omsk and the Omsk Regional Court acting on appeal respectively dismissed his claims. The courts found no evidence of unlawful actions against the applicant.

4. Application no. 40179/08

The ap plication was lodged on 23 July 2008 by Mr Marsel Rafikovich Rezvanov who was born on 31 May 1967 and lives in Kashin, Moscow Region. He is represented by Mr L. Yerchenko, a lawyer practicing in Moscow.

On 20 February 2008 at about 7 p.m. the traffic police arrested the applicant. On 21 February 2008 at 1.50 p.m. the applicant was formally arrested as a suspect in a robbery case. On 22 February 2008 the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow ordered the applicant ’ s detention pending trial.

On 5 May 2008 the applicant was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment. On 23 June 2008 the Moscow City Court upheld the judgment on appeal.

The applicant complained to a court about his unrecorded detention from 20 to 21 February 2008. On 2 October 2008 the District Court rejected the complaint as unsubstantiated. It also found that it should have been filed in accordance with the criminal law procedure. On 2 December 2008 the City Court upheld that judgment on appeal.

5. Application no. 49087/08

The application was lodged on 21 August 2008 by Mr Daniil Aleksandrovich Chulukov who was born on 11 January 1982 and lives in Novokuybyshevsk, Orenburg Region.

On 16 March 2007 at 7.25 p.m. the applicant was arrested during a test purchase of drugs. On 18 March 2007 at 11.30 p.m. his arrest record was drawn. On 19 March 2007 the Promyshlennyy District Court of Orenburg authorised his detention.

On 10 January 2008 the Tsentralnyy District Court of Orenburg convicted the applicant and sentenced him to imprisonment, running from 16 March 2007. On 21 February 2008 the Orenburg Regional Court partly modified the characterisation of the applicant ’ s offences and upheld the remainder of the judgment. On 18 August 2008 the Presidium of the Orengburg Regional Court amended the characterisation of the applicant ’ s offences once again and upheld the remainder of the judgment.

6. Application no. 32462/09

The application was lodged on 4 May 2009 by Mr Aleksey Aleksandrovich Truben kov who was born on 24 February 1979 and lives in Startsevo, Krasnoyarsk Region.

O n 7 February 2009 at 10.40 p.m. the applicant was brought to a police station where the applicant allegedly resisted police officers. At 10.50 p.m. he was placed in a cell for administratively arrested persons until 2.35 a.m. on 8 February 2009.

On 8 February 2009 at 6.35 p.m. the applicant was formally arrested as a suspect in a money extortion case.

On 10 February 2009 the Norilskiy Town Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region ordered the applicant ’ s detention. On 7 April 2009 the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court upheld the detention order on appeal.

On 11 February 2009 the applicant complained to the prosecutor ’ s office about his unrecorded detention and belated – outside of the forty-eight hours ’ statutory time-limit – court authorisation of his detention. On 13 February 2009 the prosecutor ’ s office dismissed his complaint. The applicant unsuccessfully challenged the prosecutor office ’ s decision before a court. On 10 March and 21 May 2009 the Town Court and the Regional Court respectively rejected his complaint. The courts found that the statutory time-limits and procedures had been respected: the applicant had been initially arrested for an administrative offence of disorderly conduct and then as a suspect in a money extortion case.

On 9 November 2009 the City Court convicted the applicant and sentenced him to imprisonment running from 7 February 2009. On 23 March 2010 the Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal.

7. Application no. 23254/10

The ap plication was lodged on 5 April 2010 by Ms Galina Aleksandrovna S altseva who was born on 20 June 1974 and lives in Krasnoyarsk.

On 30 June 2009 at 7.45 p.m. the applicant was arrested. According to the applicant, she came to the police station after a call from her district police officer. According to the prosecuting authorities, the applicant was arrested for an administrative offence of disorderly conduct.

On 1 July 2009 at 8 a.m. the applicant was taken from the cell for administratively arrested persons to an investigator. At 2 p.m. the investigator formally arrested the applicant as a suspect in a theft case.

On 3 July 2009 the District Court ordered the applicant ’ s detention. On 26 August and 30 September 2009 the District Court extended her detention. On 15 October 2009 the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court confirmed the latter extension order on appeal.

On 19 November 2009 the District Court further extended the applicant ’ s detention.

All detention orders were based on the following grounds: the applicant had been charged with serious offences committed while she was serving a suspended sentence for another offence. The District Court considered that the above circumstances demonstrated that the applicant would reoffend if not placed into detention. The District Court dismissed the applicant ’ s arguments that she had permanent residence registration, employment and an underage child.

On 11 December 2009 the District Court extended her detention referring to the same reasons. On 28 January 2010 the Regional Court upheld the extension order on appeal.

On 21 April 2010 the District Court convicted the applicant and sentenced her to imprisonment. On 28 October 2010 the Regional Court upheld the judgment.

On 12 August 2010 the prosecuting authorities admitted that the applicant ’ s detention from 7.45 p.m. of 30 June to 8.00 a.m. of 1 July 2009 had been unlawful. They found that the failure of the police to draw the record of the applicant ’ s administrative detention had been unlawful but did not amount to a criminal offence.

8. Application no. 1168/11

The applic ation was lodged on 12 November 2010 by Mr Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Tabolin who was born on 25 July 1983 and lives in Ukhta, Komi Republic.

On 27 April 2009 at 2.10 p.m. the applicant was arrested. The arrest record was drawn at 10.25 p.m.

On 29 April 2009 the Syktyvkar Town Court of the Komi Republic authorised the applicant ’ s detention. In April 2010, after the investigation was completed, the applicant filed several requests for release. On 6 and 19 April 2010 the Town Court rejected his requests. The court relied on the gravity of the charges, the applicant ’ s criminal record, lack of income and a consequent risk of reoffending and impeding the criminal proceedings. The applicant appealed against the court order of 6 April 2010. The Supreme Court of the Komi Republic upheld the order on 12 October 2010.

On 31 August 2010 the Town Court found that the investigator ’ s failure to draw up the arrest record within the statutory three-hour ’ time-limit had been unlawful. However, the Town Court found that it had no competence to examine the applicant ’ s complaint about the allegedly unlawful detention. The Town Court considered that the applicant should have challenged the lawfulness of his detention at the moment when that detention had been authorised by a court. On 22 October 2010 the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic upheld the above judgment on appeal.

On 7 June 2010 the Town Court found the applicant guilty of robbery and sentenced him to four years ’ imprisonment. On 12 October 2010 the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic upheld the conviction on appeal.

9. Application no. 55988/11

The appl ication was lodged on 21 August 2011 by Mr Dmitriy Yuryevich Grish in who was born on 28 September 1997 and lives in Moscow. He is represented by Mr S. Mirzoyev, a lawyer practicing in Moscow.

On 14 April 2010 at 9 p.m. police arrested the applicant after a test purchase of drugs. On 15 April 2010 at 3.20 p.m. the applicant ’ s arrest record was drawn.

On 29 December 2010 the Lefortovskiy District Court of Moscow convicted the applicant of drug dealing. The District Court mentioned in the judgment that the applicant had been actually arrested on 14 April 2010. On 21 March 2011 the Moscow City Court upheld the judgment on appeal. As for the applicant ’ s unrecorded detention, the City Court found no evidence of restrictions of his liberty before the arrest record had been drawn.

10. Application no. 61400/11

The appl ication was lodged on 31 August 2011 by Mr Anton Olegovich S hipanov who was born on 14 June 1986 and lives in Dimitrovgrad. He is represented by Ms L. Gataullina, a lawyer practicing in Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk Region.

On 8 July 2011 the police arrested the applicant at about 12 a.m. His arrest record was drawn at 9.25 p.m.

On 10 July 2011 the Zasviyazhskiy District Court of the Ulyanovsk Region ordered the applicant ’ s detention. The District Court rejected the argument about the actual time of arrest on the ground that at 12 a.m. the applicant had been “conveyed” to the police station rather than arrested. On 14 July 2011 the Ulyanovsk Regional Court upheld the detention order on appeal.

11. Application no. 70401/11

The appl ication was lodged on 9 October 2011 by Mr Rafail Mageramovich Abbasov who was born on 2 January 1983 and lives in Tula. He is represented by Mr N.Tadzhetdinov, a lawyer practicing in Volzhskiy, Volgograd Region.

The applicant was arrested on 11 October 2010 at about 5.10 p.m. The arrest record was drawn on 12 October 2010 at 2.25 a.m. On 13 October 2010 a Justice of the Peace found the applicant guilty of taking of drugs without a medical prescription and sentenced him to one day ’ s administrative detention, running from 2.40 a.m. of 12 October 2010.

On 13 October 2010 the Volzhskiy Town Court of the Volgograd Region authorised the applicant ’ s detention. The Town Court relied on the fact that the applicant was suspected of a serious drug related crime, was a drug addict, could obstruct the investigation and reoffend. The applicant did not appeal against the detention order.

On 6 December 2010 the Town Court extended the applicant ’ s detention. It reiterated that the applicant was charged with a particularly serious offence and had no official sources of income. The Town Court also rejected the applicant ’ s request for release on bail against his mother ’ s flat for lack of documents proving the kinship between the applicant and his mother, her ownership of the flat or her intention to provide it as a guarantee. On 17 December 2010 the Regional Court upheld the court order on appeal. The Regional Court found that the fact that the applicant had no criminal record, had a permanent residence, employment, positive references and an underage child, had formerly participated in military actions and followed an in-patient treatment were insufficient to warrant his release in view of the severity of the charges against him.

On 1 March 2011 the Town Court further extended the applicant ’ s detention on the ground that he might reoffend and obstruct the investigation. On 5 March 2011 the Regional Court upheld the court order on appeal.

On 7 April 2011 the Town Court ordered a further extension of the applicant ’ s detention.

On 31 May 2011 the Volzhskiy District Court of the Volgograd Region convicted the applicant. The District Court rejected the applicant ’ s arguments that evidence obtained during his unrecorded detention had been inadmissible. On 26 July 2011 the Volgograd Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal. On 20 May 2015 the Presidium of the Volgograd Regional Court quashed the judgments of 31 May and 26 July 2011 on the ground that the trial judge had earlier adjudicated the case of his co-accused. The Presidium remitted the applicant ’ s case for a re-trial and authorised his detention.

12. Application no. 5375/12

The appl icant was lodged on 15 December 2011 by Mr Mikhail Aleksandrovich Naumenko who was born on 7 May 1988 and lives in Krasnoyarsk.

On 7 September 2011 at about 6 p.m. the police arrested the applicant. The arrest record was drawn on 8 September 2011 at 5.25 p.m. It indicated the time of the actual arrest as 4.35 p.m. of 8 September 2011.

On 10 September 2011 the Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk ordered the applicant ’ s detention. On 27 September 2011 the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court upheld the detention order on appeal. The national courts found that the applicant had been arrested in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.

13. Application no. 25756/12

The application was lodged on 28 March 2012 by Mr Roman Valeryevich Kashchayev who was born on 7 November 1974 and lives in Kashira , Moscow region . He is represented by Ms M. Kazantseva, a lawyer practicing in Moscow.

On 11 February 2012 at about 6.30 p.m. the applicant was arrested for possession of drugs and brought to a police station. The official arrest record was drawn on 12 February 2012 at 5.20 a.m. The applicant claimed that, despite his request, he was not assisted by a lawyer during his official arrest.

On 13 February 2012 the Stupinskiy District Court of Moscow ordered the applicant ’ s detention. The District Court noted the seriousness of charges against the applicant, his lack of employment or permanent residence registration in the Moscow Region. The applicant appealed against the detention order, complaining of his unrecorded detention and the lack of legal assistance during his arrest. On 24 February 2012 the Moscow Regional Court upheld the detention order on appeal. The Regional Court did not address the issues of the applicant ’ s unrecorded detention or the absence of a lawyer. It found that the applicant had been arrested in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.

14. Application no. 30658/13

The ap plication was lodged on 8 April 2013 by Mr Vladimir Viktorovich Ye gorin who was born on 7 January 1966 and lives in Misha-Yag, Komi Republic.

On 15 January 2010 at 4.20 p.m. the police arrested the applicant. The official arrest record was drawn on 16 January 2010. On 17 January 2010 a court authorised the applicant ’ s detention.

On 30 April 2010 the Usinsk Town Court of the Komi Republic convicted the applicant as charged. On 13 July 2010 the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic upheld the conviction on appeal.

The applicant asked that 15 January 2010 be recognised as the date of his actual arrest and that the imprisonment term start running from that date. On 13 May 2013 the Town Court rejected his claims as unfounded. On 23 August 2013 the Supreme Court of the Komi Republic confirmed the judgment.

15. Application no. 63531/13

The applica tion was lodged on 11 September 2013 by Mr Ala Sapayevich Apa yev who was born on 22 November 1963 and lives in Ishim, Tyumen Region.

On 28 December 2012 at 8.05 p.m. the police arrested the applicant in the train going to Moscow and placed him in detention. An arrest record was drawn on the same day at 11.25 p.m. On 30 and 31 December 2012 two police officers accompanied the applicant by train to Tyumen. On 1 January 2013 a new arrest record was drawn, indicating 6.50 a.m. as the time of the applicant ’ s arrest. According to the applicant, the initial arrest record of 28 December 2012 disappeared from his case file. On 2 January 2013 the Kalininskiy District Court of Tyumen authorised the applicant ’ s detention. The court omitted to examine the lawfulness of the applicant ’ s detention prior to 1 January 2013. On 24 January 2013 the Tyumen Regional Court dismissed the applicant ’ s appeal against his detention order. The Regional Court found that the applicant ’ s arrest and detention had been lawful.

16. Application no. 2838/14

The applic ation was lodged on 20 December 2013 by Mr Dmitriy Sergeyevich Mesh chaninov who was born on 6 June 1982 and lives in Moscow.

On 12 November 2013 at about 4 p.m. the applicant was arrested by the Federal Security Service (“FSB”). It appears that the applicant spent the next thirty-four hours handcuffed, first in the FSB officers ’ car and then on the police premises. He was allegedly denied access to any means of communication or to legal assistance. On 14 November 2013 at 1 a.m. a fraud criminal case was opened against the applicant. On 14 November 2013 at 2.30 a.m. the applicant ’ s arrest record was drawn. Later that day, at 5.30 p.m. according to the applicant, the Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow authorised his detention. The District Court rejected the applicant ’ s complaint about the unrecorded detention. On 27 November 2013 the Moscow City Court upheld the detention order on appeal. The City Court noted that during the thirty-four hours between the applicant ’ s actual arrest and his formal arrest as a suspect he had been “conveyed” to the investigator.

17. Application no. 7442/15

The application was lodged on 25 January 2015 by Mr Khuseyn Khamzatovich Tsetiyev who was born on 10 October 1981 and lives in Krasnyy Oktyabr, Moscow Region. He is represented by Ms T. Okushko, a lawyer practicing in Moscow.

On 21 September 2014 at about 11 p.m. the police arrested the applicant and brought him to a police station. According to the applicant, the police established his identity and place of residence, questioned him, took his photo and fingerprints. He was not informed about his rights or the reasons for the arrest. On 22 September 2014 at 6 a.m. the applicant was released.

On 23 September 2014 at 5 a.m. the police took the applicant from his house to a police station for his identification by the victim and questioning. The applicant was not provided with legal assistance. At 9 p.m. the investigator drew a record of the applicant ’ s arrest for a criminal offence of disorderly conduct. At 9.30 p.m. the applicant was questioned as a suspect without legal assistance. It appears that the lawyer hired by the applicant ’ s family was not allowed to see his client.

On 25 September 2014 the Troitskiy District Court of Moscow authorised the applicant ’ s detention in view of the gravity of charges against him, permanent residence outside of Moscow and the lack of employment or dependent persons. The applicant appealed against the court order complaining, in particular, about the police ’ s failure to inform him about his rights and to provide him with legal assistance. On 31 October 2014 the Moscow City Court upheld the detention order on appeal.

On 1 October 2014 the investigator charged the applicant with murder and questioned him in the absence of the counsel hired by his family.

On 21 November 2014 the Dorogomilovskiy District Court of Moscow extended the detention of the applicant and his co-defendants. The applicant complained on appeal that the extension order had been based on the same reasons as before and had been issued in respect of all co-defendants without examining their particular situations. On 16 December 2014 the Moscow City Court confirmed the extension order endorsing the District Court ’ s reasoning. On 20 January 2015 the District Court further extended the applicant ’ s detention on the same grounds. The applicant appealed against the extension order.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention about their unrecorded detention.

Seven applicants (applications nos. 26220/07, 32462/09, 23254/10, 1168/11, 5375/12, 2838/14 and 7442/15) also complain under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that in breach of the national law requirements the courts authorised their detention more than forty-eight hours after their actual arrest.

Three applicants (applications nos. 26220/07, 7814/08 and 23254/10) complain under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention about the inability to obtain compensation for their unrecorded detention.

Four applicants (applications nos. 1168/11, 23254/10, 70401/11 and 7442/15) also complain under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that their detention was excessively long and was based on insufficient reasons.

COMMON QUESTIONS

1. Were the applicants deprived of their liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was their detention recorded as required by Article 5 § 1 of the Convention?

The Government are requested to provide copies of the register of persons escorted to police stations ( к нига/журнал учета лиц, доставленных в отдел внутренних дел ) and of detained persons ( р еестр лиц, подвергнутых задержанию) for the dates of detention as claimed by the applicants.

2. Was the applicants ’ detention “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law”, as required by Article 5 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was their detention authorised by courts within forty-eight hours after their actual arrest as required by the national law?

3. Did the applicants have an enforceable right to compensation for their detention in alleged contravention of Article 5 § 1, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention?

CASE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS

1. Applications nos. 26220/07, 7814/08, 32462/09, 23254/10 and 70401/11

Were the applicants detained under the Code of Administrative Offences and, if yes, for what period of time? If so, did the deprivation of their liberty comply with the requirements of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention?

The Government are requested to provide copies of any administrative detention records with respect to the applicants and copies of the applicants ’ administrative case-files opened under the Code of Administrative Offences .

2. Applications nos. 1168/11, 23254/10, 70401/11 and 7442/15

Was the length of the applicants ’ pre-trial detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no.

Lodged on

Applicant ’ s name

date of birth

place of residence

Represented by

26220/07*

19/05/2007

Yuriy Vasilyevich CHANOV

26/06/2007

Tyumen

Larisa Vitalyevna BLINOVA

26417/07*

08/05/2007

Andrey Dmitriyevich KASHITSIN

11/11/1969

Izhevsk, Republic of Udmurtia

7814/08*

23/12/2007

Sergey Ivanovich MASYUKOV

06/06/1975

Vorontsovka, Omsk region,

40179/08*

23/07/2008

Marsel Rafikovich REZVANOV

31/05/1967

Kashin, Moscow Region

Leonid Vladimirovich YERCHENKO

49087/08*

21/08/2008

Daniil Aleksandrovich CHULUKOV

11/01/1982

Novokuybyshevsk, Orenburg Region

32462/09

04/05/2009

Aleksey Aleksandrovich TRUBENKOV

24/02/1979

Startsevo, Krasnoyarsk Region

23254/10*

05/04/2010

Galina Aleksandrovna SALTSEVA

20/06/1974

Krasnoyarsk

1168/11*

12/11/2010

Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich TABOLIN

25/07/1983

Ukhta, Komi Republic

55988/11*

21/08/2011

Dmitriy Yuryevich GRISHIN

28/09/1997

Moscow

Sergey Boboyevich MIRZOYEV

61400/11*

31/08/2011

Anton Olegovich SHIPANOV

14/06/1986

Dimitrovgrad, Ulyanovsk Region

Liliya Akhnafovna GATAULLINA

70401/11*

09/10/2011

Rafail Mageramovich ABBASOV

02/01/1983

Tula

Nail Zakiyevich TADZHETDINOV

5375/12*

15/12/2011

Mikhail Aleksandrovich NAUMENKO

07/05/1988

Krasnoyarsk

25756/12*

28/03/2012

Roman Valeryevich KASHCHAYEV

07/11/1974

Kashira, Moscow Region

Mariya Aleksandrovna KAZANTSEVA

30658/13*

08/04/2013

Vladimir Viktorovich YEGORIN

07/01/1966

Misha-Yag, komi Republic

63531/13*

11/09/2013

Ala Sapayevich APAYEV

22/11/1963

Ishim, Tyumen Region

2838/14*

20/12/2013

Dmitriy Sergeyevich MESHCHANINOV

06/06/1982

Moscow

7442/15*

25/01/2015

Khuseyn Khamzatovich TSETIYEV

10/10/1981

Krasnyy Oktyabr, Moscow Region

Tatyana Borisovna OKUSHKO