Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PICU v. ROMANIA and 7 other applications

Doc ref: 74269/16;74276/16;74301/16;76016/16;76018/16;23375/17;23704/17;24299/17 • ECHR ID: 001-174342

Document date: May 18, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 6

PICU v. ROMANIA and 7 other applications

Doc ref: 74269/16;74276/16;74301/16;76016/16;76018/16;23375/17;23704/17;24299/17 • ECHR ID: 001-174342

Document date: May 18, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 18 May 2017

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 74269/16 Adriana Laura PICU against Romania and 7 other applications (see list appended)

The applicants are Romanian nationals. The applicants ’ personal details and the dates of their respective applications are set out in the appended table.

The circumstances of the cases

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, are similar to those presented in Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, §§ 12-41, 24 May 2011) and Ecaterina Mirea and Others v. Romania (nos. 43626/13 and 69 others , § § 10-15, 12 April 2016) . In respect of the applicants, the facts can be summarised as follows.

Between 23 and 25 December 1989 the applicants ’ close relatives were shot dead in Bucharest and Târgoviște during the events that led to the overthrow of the communist regime.

The main criminal investigation opened in 1990 into the use of force, both prior to and following the overthrow of communism, is currently the subject matter of file no. 11/P/2014.

On 14 October 2015 the prosecutor ’ s office closed the investigation, finding that the complaints were partly statute-barred, partly subject to an amnesty and partly ill ‑ founded. It also found that some of the facts which had been investigated could not be classified as criminal offences, and some were res judicatae .

By a Prosecutor General ’ s decision of April 2016, confirmed by the High Court of Cassation and Justice on 13 June 2016, the decision of 14 October 2015 was annulled. The investigation is still ongoing before the domestic authorities.

COMPLAINT S

Relying on Article 2 of the Convention, the applicants complain of the lack of an effective criminal investigation by the authorities in order to punish those responsible for the death by gunshot of their close relatives during the events of December 1989 in Bucharest and Târgoviște .

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicants complain of the length of the criminal proceedings opened after the events of December 1989 in Bucharest and Târgoviște .

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania , nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § § 133 - 35, 24 May 2011), was the investigation in the present cases compatible with the procedural requirements of Article 2 of the Convention?

2. Was the length of the criminal proceedings in the present cases in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Lodged on

Applicant name

date of birth

place of residence

Particular circumstances of the application

Complaints to be communicated

74269/16

28/11/2016

Adriana Laura PICU

25/07/1972

Târgoviște

Daughter of a victim killed by gunshot on 24 December 1989 in Târgoviște .

2 and 6 § 1

74276/16

28/11/2016

Maria DUMITRESCU

18/06/1952

Târgoviște

Widow of a victim killed by gunshot on 24 December 1989 in Târgoviște .

2 and 6 § 1

74301/16

28/11/2016

Daniel- Ciprian DUMITRESCU

10/10/1978

Târgoviște

Son of a victim killed by gunshot on 24 December 1989 in Târgoviște .

2 and 6 § 1

76016/16

05/12/2016

Marioara ZĂRNESCU

19/01/1955

Bucharest

Widow of a victim injured by gunshot on 23 December 1989 and dead on 25 December 1989 in Bucharest.

2 and 6 § 1

76018/16

05/12/2016

Florin ZĂRNESCU

02/11/1972

Bucharest

Son of a victim injured by gunshot on 23 December 1989 and dead on 25 December 1989 in Bucharest.

2 and 6 § 1

23375/17

20/03/2017

Constantin FILIP

29/01/1976

Măgurele, Ilfov County

Son of a victim killed by gunshot on 25 December 1989 in Bucharest.

2 and 6 § 1

23704/17

20/03/2017

Steluța Tarța

03/09/1968

Bucharest

Daughter o f a victim killed by gunshot on 25 December 1989 in Bucharest.

2 and 6 § 1

24299/17

21/03/2017

Nicolae Zărnescu

05/08/1979

Torrejon de Ardoz , Spain

Son of a victim injured by gunshot on 23 December 1989 and dead on 25 December 1989 in Bucharest.

2 and 6 § 1

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846