Communicated on 22 September 2017

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 78836/16 Bosiljka BURSAĆ and Others against Croatia lodged on 15 December 2016

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the alleged lack of an effective investigation into the killing of the applicants ’ close relative in 1995, allegedly by Croatian soldiers, which investigation is still pending. It also concerns a decision ordering the applicants to bear the costs of civil proceeding sin which they sought compensation in connection with the death of their relative.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES

1. Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see paragraph 104 of Salman v. Turkey [GC ], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention?

2. In respect of the costs that the applicants were ordered to pay to the State, has there been an interference with the applicants ’ peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?

3. If so, was the interference in the public interest and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?

4. If so, was that interference necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest? In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Cindrić and Bešlić v. Croatia, no. 72152/13 , 6 September 2016) so that the following criteria were satisfied:

(1) that the State was represented by the State Attorney ’ s Office and the costs of the State ’ s representation were calculated in an amount equal to a lawyer ’ s fee;

(2) that the applicants ’ claim before the national courts was not devoid of any substance or manifestly unreasonable;

(3) in the light of the applicants ’ individual financial situation, that the order to bear the costs at issue was a significant financial burden on them?

APPENDIX