Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ZULFIYA ALIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications

Doc ref: 66249/16;66271/16;75978/16;77309/16;77691/16;1038/17 • ECHR ID: 001-178041

Document date: September 27, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

ZULFIYA ALIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications

Doc ref: 66249/16;66271/16;75978/16;77309/16;77691/16;1038/17 • ECHR ID: 001-178041

Document date: September 27, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 27 September 2017

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 66249/16 Zulfiya ALIYEVA against Azerbaijan and 5 other applications (see list appended)

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The applications concern the applicants ’ complaint about non-payment of statutory additional compensation for expropriation of their properties by the Baku City Executive Authority (”the BCEA”) through conclusion of sale contracts with them on the basis of Order No. 243 of the head of the BCEA dated 31 May 2011 entitled “Relocation of housing and commercial premises from within the area bordered by 7 and 9 Agil Guliyev Street, 2 Fathi Khoshginabi Street, 9 Aydin Nasirov Street, 3 and 10 to 12 Elchin and Vusal Hajibabayevs Street in the Sabail District for the expansion of the highway.” The order stated that the residents of the buildings and houses located in the above-mentioned area were to be relocated and given compensation of 1,500 Azerbaijani manats (AZN) per sq. m. of surface area. The additional compensation that the applicants claim to be entitled to consists of the following:

‑ Additional compensation in the amount of 20% of the main compensation, in accordance with Presidential Decree no. 689 of 26 December 2007; and

‑ Additional compensation in the amount of 10% of the main compensation, in accordance with Article 66 of the Law on Expropriation of Lands (except application no. 64650/16).

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES

1. Have the applicants been deprived of their possessions in the public interest, and in accordance with the conditions provided by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?

In particular, were the applicants entitled to statutory additional compensation in the amounts of 20% and 10% (except application no. 64650/16) of the main compensation respectively?

Were the applicant ’ s properties expropriated by the State authorities in compliance with the law?

If the deprivation was lawful, did that deprivation impose and excessive burden on the applicants (see, mutatis mutandis , Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999 ‑ V)?

2. Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?

In particular, have the applicants been refused to be paid additional compensation, whereas other individuals in the same situation have been paid such compensation?

If so, did that difference in treatment pursue a legitimate aim; and did it have a reasonable justification?

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Nationality

Represented by

66249/16

08/11/2016

Zulfiya ALIYEVA

1971Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

66271/16

08/11/2016

Nazila MAMMADOVA

1964Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

75978/16

02/12/2016

Svetlana FEDOROVA

1954Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

77309/16

07/12/2016

Turan ALIYEV

1989Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

77691/16

07/12/2016

Guteyis HUSEYNOVA

1973Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

1038/17

13/12/2016

Tatyana MURATOVA

1944Baku

Azerbaijan

Sadig BAGIROV

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846