DAĞTEKIN v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 69448/10 • ECHR ID: 001-181937
Document date: March 6, 2018
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 1 Outbound citations:
Communicated on 6 March 2018
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 69448/10 Ahmet DAÄžTEKIN against Turkey lodged on 23 July 2010
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applicant is a Turkish national who was born in 1960 and lives in Ş anl ı urfa . At the time of the events giving rise to the present application, he was the deputy mayor in the Ceylanp ı nar district of Ş anl ı urfa .
The application concerns the criminal proceedings brought against the applicant for disseminating propaganda under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713), on account of the content of a press statement he made on 25 January 2005 on the anniversary of the enforced disappearance of Serdar Tanış and Ebubekir Deniz, respectively the president and secretary of the Silopi branch of the People ’ s Democracy Party ( Halkın Demokrasi Partisi (HADEP)), in 2001. At the end of the proceedings, the Diyarbak ı r Assize Court convicted the appl icant under section 7 § 2 of Law no. 3713 and sentenced him to a total of ten months ’ imprisonment. The court then suspended the pronouncement of the applicant ’ s conviction on condition that he did not commit another intentional offence for a period of three years, under Article 231 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( hükmün açıklanmasının geri bırakılması ). It further banned the applicant from participating in political meetings and demonstrations for a period of one year. On 1 August 2012 the Diyarbak ı r Assize Court decided to suspend the execution of its previous judgment in view of the provisions of Law no. 6352 of 5 July 2012.
The applicant relies on Articles 10, 11 and 13 of the Convention.
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES
Has there been a violation of the applicant ’ s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, on account of his conviction under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act?