Communicated on 15 May 2018

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 23345/10 Ebru Dİ NÇER against Turkey lodged on 31 July 2009

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant ’ s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer ( see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008 , and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50 541/08 and 3 others, ECHR 2016).

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES

Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against her, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicant during the preliminary investigation (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008, and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, ECHR 2016 ) ?

The parties are invited to inform the Court when the decision of Court of Cassation dated 17 October 20 0 8 was deposited with the registry of the first-instance court and when the applicant was informed or acquired knowledge of that decision.

The Government are invited to submit copies of all the relevant documents concerning the applicant ’ s case, including but not limited to the minutes of all the hearings, the reasoned judgment(s) of the trial court, the decisions of the Court of Cassation, documentary evidence against the applicant, and the written submissions of the applicant and her lawyer throughout the proceedings.