LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Doc ref: 57978/14 • ECHR ID: 001-184715
Document date: June 21, 2018
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
Doc ref: 57978/14 • ECHR ID: 001-184715
Document date: June 21, 2018
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 21 June 2018
FIFTH SECTION
Application no. 57978/14 Ramiz MAMMADOV and O thers against Azerbaijan lodged on 15 August 2014
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applicants are internally displaced persons (IDPs), who moved to Baku as a result of the occupation of their home towns by Armenian armed forces and settled in squatter houses built by them in Baku. The application concerns the alleged unlawful expropriation and demolition of the applicants ’ squatter houses by the Baku Metropolitan for construction of an electricity depot and the alleged discriminatory treatment on the account of the applicants ’ provision with free temporary accommodation due to their status as IDPs, whereas other residents, whose squatter houses had been demolished in the same area had been paid monetary compensation.
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES
1. Did the applicants have “possessions” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? If so, have the applicants been deprived of their possessions in the public interest, and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention ? In particular, what were the substantive and procedural conditions required by the applicable law for the expropriation or demolition to be lawful, and were those conditions complied with in the present case? If the interference was lawful, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
2. Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
In particular, have the applicants been refused to be paid monetary compensation, whereas other individuals in the same situation have been paid such compensation?
If so, did that difference in treatment pursue a legitimate aim; and did it have a reasonable justification?
APPENDIX
N o .
Applicant name
Birth year
Nationality
Place of residence
Representative
Ramiz MAMMADOV
1953Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Fuad ABDULOV
1962Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Samad ABDULOV
1971Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Ibrahim ALIYEV
1949Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Fatma ALIYEVA
1956Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Bayram AZIZOV
1967Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Kifayat AZIZOVA
1966Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Khalig BAKHISHOV
1972Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Allahverdi DOLKHANOV
1952Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Giyas GULIYEV
1952Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Zaur GULIYEV
1980Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Rahila HADIYEVA
1947Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Anvar HASANOV
1958Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Elshad HUMBATOV
1963Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Kamil HUSEYNOV
1961Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Talish HUSEYNOV
1940Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Knyaz MAHMUDOV
1964Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Ahliyyat MAMMADOV
1955Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Elnur MAMMADOV
1971Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Shakir MURADOV
1964Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Emir NAMAZALIYEV
1942Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
Vugar NAMAZALIYEV
1969Azerbaijan
Absheron
Hafiz Hasanov
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025
