Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ŞENGÜL AND NAYMAN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 61016/16 • ECHR ID: 001-186362

Document date: August 28, 2018

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

ŞENGÜL AND NAYMAN v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 61016/16 • ECHR ID: 001-186362

Document date: August 28, 2018

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 28 August 2018

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 61016/16 Hakime ÅžENGÃœL and others against Turkey lodged on 26 September 2016

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the abduction and subsequent killing of the first applicant ’ s husband and the remaining applicants ’ father Abdülmecit Şengül . The applicants rely on Articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Convention and allege, in particular, that no effective investigation was conducted into the abduction and killing.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES

1. Did the applicants have an “arguable claim” that there had been a violation of their rights under Article 2 of the Convention?

2. Was the decision of the Constitutional Court not to examine the applicants ’ complaints concerning the killing of their relative from the standpoint of the right to life – to which the applicants expressly referred in the application form they submitted to that court – compatible with the obligation to provide an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 of the Convention?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255