Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BUTKUS v. LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 48460/16 • ECHR ID: 001-191285

Document date: January 29, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

BUTKUS v. LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 48460/16 • ECHR ID: 001-191285

Document date: January 29, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 13 September 2017 and 29 January 2019

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 48460/16 Kęstutis BUTKUS against Lithuania lodged on 16 August 2016

The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court ’ s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties , which is available in HUDOC.

QUESTION

Is Article 8 of the Convention applicable to the applicant ’ s complaint about the permanent ban on him working as a restructuring administrator? In particular, did the impugned ban affect his “private life” to such a degree as to attain the threshold of severity under Article 8 (see Denisov v. Ukraine [GC] , no. 76639/11, §§ 115-17, 25 September 2018)?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846