Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KARKARIN v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 59131/10;60265/11;42267/15;76882/16 • ECHR ID: 001-191405

Document date: February 6, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

KARKARIN v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 59131/10;60265/11;42267/15;76882/16 • ECHR ID: 001-191405

Document date: February 6, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 6 February 2019

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 59131/10 Sergey Fedorovich KARKARIN against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended)

The applicants ’ personal details are set out in the appended table. They have all obtained final judgments in their favour, according to which different state authorities were ordered to pay them certain sums. These court decisions were enforced with a significant delay or remained unenforced. The applicants sought compensation for delayed enforcement or non-enforcement under the Compensation Act. The respective information about the judgments in the applicants ’ favour and their enforcement, courts decisions concerning the compensation awards and respective sums are indicated in the appended table.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain about the insufficiency of the amounts awarded as compensation for the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in their favour or refusal to grant such compensation. In application no. 42267/15 the applicant complains about non-enforcement of the final judgment in his favour and refusal to grant compensation for non-enforcement. In application no. 59131/10 the applicant also complains that he was not summoned to the hearing at the cassation instance.

QUESTIONS to the parties

1. Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in application no. 59131/10 on account of the Belgorod Regional Court’s failure to inform the applicant about the hearing at the cassation instance ?

2 . Have there been violations of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the lengthy enforcement or non ‑ enforcement of the judg ments in the applicants’ favour?

3 . Having regard to the proceedi ngs instituted by the applicants under the Law no. 68-FZ of 30 April 2010, “On Compensation for Violation of the Right to a Trial within a Reasonable Time or the Right to Enforcement of a Judgment within a Reasonable Time” (“the Compensation Act”), did the applicants have an effective domestic remedy for the lengthy enforcement or non-enforcement of the final judgment s , as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no .

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Place of residence

Nationality

Represented by

Final domestic decision details

(in Russian roubles (RUB))

Length of enforcement proceedings

Compensation for delayed

enforcement or refusal

(in RUB)

Other complaints

Amount Friendly Settlement

(in euros (EUR))

59131/10

10/09/2010

Sergey Fedorovich KARKARIN

26/01/1956

Staryy Oskol

Russian

1) Starooskolk Town Court

20/11/2002

RUB 5,369.21 (arrears) + RUB 1,483.04 (monthly payments)

2) Starooskolk Town Court

27/05/2004

RUB 794.88 + RUB 1,681.76

3) Starooskolk Town Court

25/10/2005

RUB 1,076.32 + RUB 1,816.30

1) 1 year and 6 months

2) 1 year and 6 months

3) 1 year and 1 month

Belgorod Regional Court

27/04/2010

RUB 10,000

Enforced on 22/07/2010

A6-was not informed about the

hearing at the Belgorod Regional Court (cassation instance)

EUR 2,300

60265/11

18/07/2011

Aleksandr Yuryevich KOVALKOV

06/07/1960

Moscou

Russian

1) Ryazansk Garrison Court

12/12/2008

RUB 10,922 – monthly payments for three months of 2008 (specified by the decision of 22/01/2010)

2) Ryazansk Garrison Court

18/03/2009

RUB 11,232 – monthly payments for three months of 2008-2009 (specified by the decision of 22/01/2010)

1) 5 years, 1 month and 22 days

2) 4 years, 11 months and 18 days

Moscow Regional Military Court

29/12/2010

RUB 5,000 for each judgment

Remained unenforced

EUR 10,100

42267/15

05/08/2015

Ivan Ivanovich PALIY

17/11/1949

Sadovy

Russian

Tatyana Igorevna SLADKOVA

Leninskiy District Court of

Rostov- na - Donu

17/08/2011

17/10/2011

RUB 300,000 (compensation for non-pecuniary damage due to the applicant ’ s son demise)

Non-enforced

Rostov Regional Court

03/03/2015

9/12/2015

Rejected

EUR 7,100

76882/16

26/11/2016

Andrey Igorevich RESIN

29/07/1974

Khabarovsk

Russian

Tatyana Robertovna YESINA

Kirov District Court

25/11/2011

RUB 10,200 (Compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage, costs and expenses)

3 years, 1 month and 19 days

Khabarovsk Regional Court

15/10/2015

22/07/2016

RUB 5,000

Enforced

EUR 2,700

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707