Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DE LORENZO v. ITALY

Doc ref: 6445/10 • ECHR ID: 001-193667

Document date: May 16, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

DE LORENZO v. ITALY

Doc ref: 6445/10 • ECHR ID: 001-193667

Document date: May 16, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 16 May 2019

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 6445/10 Laura DE LORENZO and O thers against Italy lodged on 23 December 2009

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The case concerns the deprivation of the applicants ’ land through the application of an indirect form of expropriation (“ occupazione acquisitiva ”) by the domestic courts. In 1981 the applicants lodged proceedings before the Palmi District Court arguing that they had been unlawfully dispossessed of their property and seeking compensation. The District Court delivered its decision in 2014, finding that the deprivation of the applicants ’ land had been unlawful and that they were entitled to compensation. In the same year the expropriating authority lod ged an appeal against the first ‑ instance decision before the Reggio Calabria Court of Appeal. The proceedings before the Reggio Calabria Court of Appeal are still ongoing. The applicants argue that over thirty years have elapsed from the date they lodged the domestic proceedings and they have not been able to obtain compensation for the unlawful deprivation of their property.

QUESTION S T O THE PARTIES

1. Have the applicants been deprived of their possessions in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, amongst many other authorities, Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy , no. 58858/00, 8 December 2005; Rivera and di Bonaventura v. Italy , no. 63869/00, 14 June 2011; De Caterina and Others v. Italy , no. 65278/01, 28 June 2011; and Messana v. Italy , no. 26128/04, 9 February 2017)?

2. Has there been a breach of the applicants ’ right of access to a court within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

3. Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Firstname LASTNAME

Birth year

Place of residence

Representative

1Laura DE LORENZO

1936Naples

A. Saccucci

2Francesco DE LORENZO

1938Rome

A. Saccucci

3Renato DE LORENZO

1942Naples

A. Saccucci

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255