NAFORNIȚA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Doc ref: 49066/12 • ECHR ID: 001-194281
Document date: June 4, 2019
- 1 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 3 Outbound citations:
Communicated on 4 June 2019
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 49066/12 Iurie NAFORNIÈšA and others against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 26 July 2012
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The application concerns divergence in the case-law of the domestic courts and termination of the applicants ’ occupation of their dwelling. I t raises issues under Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES
1. Do the facts of the case disclose a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the courts adopt divergent decisions concerning the rights of a group of persons, including the applicants, in essentially the same legal situation (see Beian v. Romania (no. 1) , no. 30658/05, §§ 29-40, ECHR 2007 ‑ V (extracts))? Did they give relevant and sufficient reasons for their judgments?
2. Is Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention applicable in the present case? If so, were the applicants ’ rights guaranteed under that provision breached as a result of the termination of their right to reside in their dwelling (see, mutatis mutandis , Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, §§ 127-129, ECHR 2004 ‑ XII)?
No.
Firstname LASTNAME
Birth year
Nationality
Place of residence
Representative
1Iurie NAFORNIÈšA
1968Moldovan
Ciorescu
C. Mihăilă
2Albina NAFORNITA
1967Moldovan
Chișinău
C. Mihăilă
3Alina NAFORNITA
1992Moldovan
Chișinău
C. Mihăilă
4Andrei NAFORNITA
1998Moldovan
Chișinău
C. Mihăilă