Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BANDURKA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 5701/11;5705/11 • ECHR ID: 001-194944

Document date: July 3, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

BANDURKA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 5701/11;5705/11 • ECHR ID: 001-194944

Document date: July 3, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 21 June 2018 and 3 July 2019

FIFTH SECTION

Applications nos. 5701/11 and 5705/11 Viktor Andriyovych BANDURKA against Ukraine and Lyubov Ivanivna BANDURKA against Ukraine lodged on 14 January 2011 and 14 January 2011 respectively

The Statement of Facts and Questions to the parties is available in HUDOC .

QUESTIONS

1. Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the present case?

In particular, has the authorities ’ alleged failure to enforce in a timely manner the judgments of 2 October 2009 in the applicants ’ favour, as modified on appeal, breached Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example and mutatis mutandis , Metaxas v. Greece , no. 8415/02, § 19, 27 May 2004, and Lizanets v. Ukraine , no. 6725/03, § 43, 31 May 2007)?

2. Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the alleged failure to enforce the judgments?

3. Has there been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in the present case? In particular, do the applicants have an effective domestic remedy in respect of the aforementioned alleged failure to enforce the judgments in a timely manner?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255