Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KLUBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 4878/18 • ECHR ID: 001-199534

Document date: November 25, 2019

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

KLUBOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 4878/18 • ECHR ID: 001-199534

Document date: November 25, 2019

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 25 November 2019

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 4878/18 Aleksandr Borisovich KLUBOV and others against Russia lodged on 13 December 2017

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The applicants are Russian nationals. They are represented by Mr E. Mezak and Mr A. Laptev, lawyers practising in Syktyvkar and Moscow respectively. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On 12 June 2017 the police arrested the applicants at the site of an unauthorised manifestation against corruption at Marsovo Pole, St Petersburg. The applicants were held in a police van for several hours and then taken to a police station.

Messrs Klubov , Melnikov and Samarin were detained in a cell measuring 6.9 sq. m and housing eight detainees. The cell was equipped with two narrow benches. It was impossible to lean against the walls which had an abrasive surface. There was no window or ventilation. The lighting was dim. The toilet, which was clogged, was located outside the cell with no light or door. The applicants received water and some food at 1 a.m. on 13 June 2017.

Mr Nechayev and eight other detainees were detained in cell no. 3 measuring 8.8 sq. m. There were no beds or benches in the cell. Instead, it was equipped with a wooden board measuring 5.4 sq. m. There was no window or ventilation. The lighting was dim. The walls had abrasive surface. It was impossible to lean against them. The detainees received some food and water at 5 a.m. on 13 June 2017. The second meal was provided at 2 p.m.

On 13 June 2017 between 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. the applicants were taken to the courthouse.

On the same date the Kolpinskiy District Court of St Petersburg found the applicants guilty of (1) refusal to comply with a lawful police order and (2) violation of the procedure prescribed for the conduct of a public gathering, and imposed fines on them.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention about the conditions of their detention at the police station from 12 to 13 June 2017.

The applicants complain under Article 5 of the Convention that their arrest and detention were not “lawful” or “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law”.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Did the material conditions of the applicants ’ detention at the police station from 29 to 30 December 2016, in particular, the personal space available in the cell and the availability of sanitary facilities, meals, drinking water, beds and bed linen, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment (see Fedotov v. Russia , no. 5140/02, §§ 66-70, 25 October 2005)?

2. Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 3 of the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

3. Were the applicants ’ arrest and detention “lawful” and “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law” as required by Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia , no. 76204/11 , §§ 89-98, 4 December 2014) ?

APPENDIX

No.

Applicant ’ s Name

Birth date

Nationality

Place of residence

1Aleksandr Borisovich KLUBOV

12/02/1974

Russian

St Petersburg

2Sergey Yuryevich MELNIKOV

16/09/1964

Russian

St Petersburg

3Petr Andreyevich NECHAYEV

16/06/1975

Russian

St Petersburg

4Nikita Aleksandrovich SAMARIN

04/04/1994

Russian

St Petersburg

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255