Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PANCHENKO v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 66179/14;58700/16;58829/16;38002/17 • ECHR ID: 001-201715

Document date: February 10, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

PANCHENKO v. UKRAINE and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 66179/14;58700/16;58829/16;38002/17 • ECHR ID: 001-201715

Document date: February 10, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 10 February 2020 Published on 2 March 2020

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 66179/14 Andrey Alekseyevich PANCHENKO against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended)

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The cases mainly concern the applicants ’ placement in prisons located far from their families and the repeated rejections of their requests for transfer to a closer prison. In addition to Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention, the applicants (except Mr Sili ) also refer to Article 6 § 1 as regards the manner in which their above-mentioned requests were treated.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES As regards all the applications

1. Has there been a violation of the applicants ’ right to respect for their family life under Article 8 of the Convention on account of their placement in prisons remote from their homes (see Vintman v. Ukraine , no. 28403/05 , §§ 76-104, 2 3 October 2014)?

2. Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention in respect of the above complaint? If so, the Government are invited to provide relevant case-law or practice (if any) on the matter.

ADDITIONAL QUESTION TO THE PARTIES As regards ALL THE applicationS EXCEPT no. 58700/16

Did the applicants have access to court to challenge the refusals of their requests for transfer to a closer prison, as required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant

Year of Birth

Place(s) of Detention

Represented by

Distance of Prison from Home

Period of Detention in Remote Prison

Relatives, with whom the Contact is Impeded

1

66179/14

Panchenko v. Ukraine

19/09/2014

Andrey Alekseyevich PANCHENKO

1975Novgorod ‑ Siverskyy Prison no. 31

About 800 km

Starting from July 2012

Mother

2

58700/16

Sili

v. Ukraine

11/11/2016

Nikolay Yevdokimovich SILI

1958Romny Prison no. 56

About 500 km

Starting from March 2009

Daughter ,

son-in-law,

two grandchildren

3

58829/16

Baylo

v. Ukraine

03/09/2015

Oleg Grigoryevich BAYLO

1975Novgorod ‑ Siverskyy Prison no. 31

Olena Yevgeniyivna SAPOZHNIKOVA

About 900 km

Starting from April 2012

Mother and sisters

4

38002/17

Kus

v. Ukraine

18/05/2017

Pavlo Mykolayovych KUS

1978Yenakiyeve prison

no. 52;

Bahmut prison no. 6

Ganna Volodymyrivna OVDIYENKO

About 1,100 km

From September 2004 to December 2015 – in Yenakiyeve prison no. 52;

from December 2015 until now – in Bahmut prison no. 6 (both prisons are located at about the same distance from the applicant ’ s home)

Parents and brother

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255