Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

LAURENȚIU-ȘTEFAN VEGH v. ROMANIA and 13 other applications

Doc ref: 13064/18, 13067/18, 13068/18, 13069/18, 13074/18, 13075/18, 13077/18, 13079/18, 13080/18, 24961/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-202234

Document date: March 11, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 3

LAURENȚIU-ȘTEFAN VEGH v. ROMANIA and 13 other applications

Doc ref: 13064/18, 13067/18, 13068/18, 13069/18, 13074/18, 13075/18, 13077/18, 13079/18, 13080/18, 24961/18, ... • ECHR ID: 001-202234

Document date: March 11, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 11 March 2020 Published on 30 March 2020

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 13064/18 Laurențiu-Ștefan VEGH against Romania and 13 other applications (see list appended)

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The applicants are former civil parties in the criminal proceedings concerning the National Fund of Investment (FNI) (see for further details concerning the factual background of the case, Albert and Others v. Romania , ( dec. ), 48006/11, 8 January 2013 and the follow-up case Murărașu v.Romania ( dec. ), no. 45733/10, 10 November 2015).

By the final judgment of 4 June 2009, the High Court of Cassation and Justice held in favour of the applicants, establishing their right to receive damages from the State budget. The judgment remained unenforced to the present day in respect of a large number (a few thousand) of creditors.

Relying mainly on Article 6 of the Convention and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (with the exception of the applicant in application no. 57915/19, who relies also on Article 13 of the Convention), the applicants complain of the non-enforcement of the outstanding judgment.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

In respect of all applications

I n the circumstances of the present cases, is the non-enforcement of the outstanding judgment rendered in the applicants’ favour compatible with the requirements of Article 6 of the Conventio n and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see for instance Foundation Hostel for Students of the Reformed Church and Stanomirescu v. Romania , nos. 2699/03 and 43597/07 , 7 January 2014 and Murărașu v.Romania ( dec. ), no. 45733/10, 10 November 2015) ?

In respect of application no. 57915/19

Does the national law offer an effective remedy against the State’s failure to enforce the outstanding judgment given in the applicant’s favour, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

Appendix

List of 14 applications

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant

Year of Birth

Place of Residence

Nationality

Represented by

1

13064/18

Laurențiu-Ștefan Vegh v. Romania

06/03/2018

Laurențiu-Ștefan VEGH

1971Hălchiu

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

2

13067/18

Karácsony v. Romania

06/03/2018

Jószef KARÁCSONY

1956Sfântu Gheoghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

3

13068/18

Fail v. Romania

07/03/2018

Enikő FAIL

1953Sfântu Gheoghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

4

13069/18

Ștefan Vegh v. Romania

07/03/2018

Ștefan VEGH

1938Sfântu Gheoghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

5

13074/18

Rodin -Attila Vegh v. Romania

07/03/2018

Rodin -Attila VEGH

1967Sfântu Gheoghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

6

13075/18

Katona v. Romania

07/03/2018

Margareta Emilia KATONA

1944Baraolt

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

7

13077/18

Kolumban v. Romania

07/03/2018

Carol KOLUMBÁN

1948Baraolt

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

8

13079/18

Diaconu v. Romania

07/03/2018

Ion DIACONU

1953Sfântu Gheoghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

9

13080/18

Kiss v. Romania

07/03/2018

Antal KISS

1952Sfântu Gheorghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

10

24961/18

Szőcs-Biró and Horvath v. Romania

14/05/2018

Judit-Mária SZŐCS-BIRÓ

1979Târgu Secuiesc

Romanian

Venczel HORVÁTH

1947Sfântu Gheorghe

Romanian

Adrian MÃŽLCU

11

51299/19

Gheorghe v. Romania

24/09/2019

Mihaela GHEORGHE

1985București

Romanian

12

51346/19

Mircea Drăgan v. Romania

24/09/2019

Mircea DRĂGAN

1945București

Romanian

13

51365/19

Alexandru Drăgan v. Romania

24/09/2019

Alexandru DRĂGAN

1988București

Romanian

14

57915/19

Pretor v. Romania

26/11/2019

Georgeta PRETOR

1961București

Romanian

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707