BARTOLO PARNIS AND OTHERS v. MALTA and 3 other applications
Doc ref: 49378/18;49380/18;49496/18;49676/18 • ECHR ID: 001-202767
Document date: March 24, 2020
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
Communicated on 24 March 2020 Published on 28 May 2020
THIRD SECTION
Application no. 49378/18 Greta BARTOLO PARNIS against Malta and 3 other applications (see list appended)
The facts and complaints in these applications have been summarised in the Court ’ s decision, which is available in HUDOC.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. In relation to apartments 11B, 20B, 24C, 30C, 33C, 41D, 44D, 46D and 49D, has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in the present case following the enactment of Act no. XVIII of 2007?
2. In relation to apartments 11B, 20B, 24C, 30C, 33C, 41D, 44D, 46D and 49D, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? In particular, having regard to the absence of an order for the eviction of the tenants, can constitutional redress proceedings be considered effective (see, mutatis mutandis , Apap Bologna v. Malta , no. 46931/12, 30 August 2016) ?
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
1
49378/18
Bartolo Parnis v. Malta
17/10/2018
Greta BARTOLO PARNIS
1965Pembroke
Maltese
2
49380/18
Anastasi v. Malta
17/10/2018
Patricia ANASTASI
1963Swieqi
Maltese
3
49496/18
Saddemi v. Malta
17/10/2018
Anna Maria SADDEMI
1960St Julians
Maltese
4
49676/18
Azzopardi v. Malta
17/10/2018
Josephine AZZOPARDI
1958St. Julian ’ s
Maltese