Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

NAMAZOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 6 other applications

Doc ref: 23036/19;27667/19;35877/19;36270/19;42877/19;57397/19;59000/19 • ECHR ID: 001-202805

Document date: April 16, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

NAMAZOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 6 other applications

Doc ref: 23036/19;27667/19;35877/19;36270/19;42877/19;57397/19;59000/19 • ECHR ID: 001-202805

Document date: April 16, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 16 April 2020 Published on 2 June 2020

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 23036/19 Shahvalad NAMAZOV against Azerbaijan and 6 other applications (see list appended)

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The applications mainly concern the travel bans imposed by the domestic authorities on the applicants who were prevented from leaving Azerbaijan. Some applicants also raise complaints under Articles 10 and 18 of the Convention.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

COMMON QUESTIONS

1. Was any restriction placed on the applicants ’ freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, as guaranteed by Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention? If so, was that restriction in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 2 § 3 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention?

2. Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

CASE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS IN RESPECT OF APPLICATIONS 23036/19, 27667/19, 36270/19 and 42877/19

1. Has there been an interference with the applicants ’ freedom of expression within the meaning of Article 10 § 1 of the Convention? If so, was that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article 10 § 2 of the Convention?

2. Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present cases, purportedly pursuant to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention?

CASE SPECIFIC QUESTION IN RESPECT OF APPLICATION 35877/19

Has there been an interference with the applicant ’ s freedom of expression within the meaning of Article 10 § 1 of the Convention? If so, was that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article 10 § 2 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Lodged on

Applicant

Year of Birth

Place of Residence

Represented by

1

23036/19

13/03/2019

Shahvalad Abutalib oglu NAMAZOV

1969, Baku

Zibeyda SADIGOVA

2

27667/19

07/05/2019

Parviz Kamran oglu HASHIMLI

1981, Baku

Zibeyda SADIGOVA

3

35877/19

07/06/2019

Mustafa Mustafa oglu HAJILI

1972, Baku

Nemat KARIMLI

4

36270/19

30/04/2019

Ayaz Habib oglu MAHARRAMOV

1982, Baku

Tural HAJIBEYLI

5

42877/19

24/06/2019

Anar Shahin oglu MAMMADOV

1979, Baku

Zibeyda SADIGOVA

6

57397/19

30/10/2019

Vidadi Ali oglu INSANOV

1970, Baku

Agaveys SAHVERDI

7

59000/19

02/11/2019

Elshan Zulfigar oglu ALIYEV

1973, Baku

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255