Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

BAKHAYEV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

Doc ref: 20353/18;20936/18;21652/18 • ECHR ID: 001-204298

Document date: July 7, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 8

BAKHAYEV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

Doc ref: 20353/18;20936/18;21652/18 • ECHR ID: 001-204298

Document date: July 7, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 7 July 2020 Published on 27 July 2020

THIRD SECTION

Application no. 20353/18 Khamzat Aliyevich BAKHAYEV against Russia and 2 other applications (see list appended)

The applicants are Russian nationals. They stood trial on murder charges. The details pertaining to each application appear in the Appendix below.

On 28 February 2015 the Moscow City Investigative Committee opened a criminal investigation into the murder of a prominent opposition leader N.

In March 2015 the applicants were arrested and remanded in custody pending investigation and trial.

On an unspecified date the investigation was completed and the case was transferred to the Moscow Circuit Military Court for a jury trial.

During the trial the applicants were placed in a glass cabin.

On 2 March 2017 the presiding judge ordered the removal of the second and third applicants from the courtroom. They were allowed to return to take part in the closing arguments.

On 29 June 2017 the jury declared the defendants guilty.

On 13 July 2017 the Moscow Circuit Military Court sentenced the applicants to different terms of imprisonment and a fine. The applicants appealed.

On 10 October 2017 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation upheld, in substance, the applicants ’ conviction on appeal. The applicants took part in the proceedings via a video link. During the hearing they were held in a metal cage.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) of the Convention that they were unable to participate effectively in the judicial proceedings because of their confinement in a glass cabin or a metal cage during the hearings and the excessively intensive schedule of those hearings and inhuman conditions of their transport to and from the courthouse.

The applicants (applications nos. 20936/18 and 21652/18) complain under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention that they were removed from the courtroom during the trial.

The applicants (applications nos. 20936/18 and 21652/18) complain under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention that the presiding judge admitted their confessions statements made in the absence of legal advice into evidence and read them out to the jury.

QUESTIONS

In the determination of the criminal charge against them, did the applicants have a fair hearing as required by Article 6 of the Convention? In particular,

(a) As regards the applicants ’ confinement in a glass cabin and a metal cage during the trial and appeal proceedings, were they afforded adequate time and facilities to prepare their defence and to maintain confidential communication with their counsel, as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) of the Convention (see Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia , nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 145-54 , 4 October 2016, and Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia , nos. 75734/12 and 2 others, §§ 248-55, 19 November 2019) ?

(b) As regards the applicants ’ exclusion from the trial (applications nos. 20936/18 and 21652/18), were the applicants able to participate effectively in the criminal proceedings against them, as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03 , §§ 169-82, 22 May 2012) ?

(c) As regards the presiding judge ’ s decision to admit the applicants ’ confession statements made in the absence of legal advice into evidence and to read them out to the jury (applications nos. 20936/18 and 21652/18), was their right to be effectively defended by a lawyer respected as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention ( see Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409/10, §§ 119-50, 9 November 2018; Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-20, 12 May 2017; and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, §§ 249-74, 13 September 2016; and Mamolina v. Russia [Committee], no. 57123/16, §§ 16-25, 17 December 2019)?

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no.

Lodged on

Applicant ’ s name

year of birth and place of residence

Represented by

Date of arrest

Sentence as determined

by the Supreme Court

20353/18

06/04/2018

Khamzat Aliyevich BAKHAYEV

1969, is serving a prison sentence in Kirovochepetsk , Kirov Region

Olga Viktorovna GOLUB

8 March 2015

11 years ’ imprisonment

20936/18

05/04/2018

Shadid Shakhidovich GUBASHEV

1983, is serving a prison sentence in Labytnangi , Yamalo-Nenentskiy Region

Roza Saidovna MAGOMEDOVA

6 March 2015

16 years ’ imprisonment

21652/18

04/04/2018

Anzor Shakhidovich GUBASHEV

1981, is serving a prison sentence in Petrozavodsk, Karelia Republic

Roza Saidovna MAGOMEDOVA

6 March 2015

19 years ’ imprisonment

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846