Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ALAKBAROV v. AZERBAIJAN and 8 other applications

Doc ref: 12563/16;12582/16;12623/16;13073/16;13078/16;17282/16;18391/16;23979/16;77321/16 • ECHR ID: 001-204970

Document date: September 8, 2020

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 9

ALAKBAROV v. AZERBAIJAN and 8 other applications

Doc ref: 12563/16;12582/16;12623/16;13073/16;13078/16;17282/16;18391/16;23979/16;77321/16 • ECHR ID: 001-204970

Document date: September 8, 2020

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 8 September 2020 Published on 28 September 2020

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 12563/16 Nizami Maharram oglu ALAKBAROV against Azerbaijan and 8 other applications (see list appended)

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE S

The applicants were nominated by various political parties or self ‑ nominated to stand as candidates in various electoral constituencies in the parliamentary elections of 1 November 2015 or the repeat elections of 18 June 2016. Their applications for registration as candidates were refused by the relevant constituency electoral commissions owing to findings that the applicants had submitted insufficient numbers of valid voter signatures in support of their nomination. The Electoral Code required a minimum of 450 supporting voter signatures. In each case, a certain number of supporting signatures submitted by each applicant was invalidated for a number of reasons, including alleged inauthenticity of supporting signatures (“signatures made by one person on behalf of several people” or “similar signatures”). The applicants appealed at the domestic level first to the Central Electoral Commission, and subsequently to higher courts, raising inter alia complaints about all or some of the following: alleged arbitrariness of the refusals to register them as candidates; alleged unlawfulness of invalidation of signatures for the reasons specified by the electoral commissions; commissions ’ experts allegedly lacking necessary qualifications; and an alleged failure by the electoral commissions to abide by a number of procedural safeguards provided by the Electoral Code.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

Common questions

1. Has there been a breach of the applicants ’ right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to stand as candidates in free elections which ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature? Did the procedure for determination of candidates ’ eligibility contain sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrary decisions (see Tahirov v. Azerbaijan , no. 31953/11, 11 June 2015 )?

2. The parties are requested to submit copies of all documents by “working groups” and/or “expert groups” of respective constituency electoral commissions and of the Central Electoral Commission, which are not already in respective case files, concerning the results of the examination of the signature sheets submitted by the applicants (expert opinions, examination results records, examination tables, etc.).

3. The parties are requested to submit detailed factual information, accompanied where relevant by supporting documents, concerning the applicants ’ and/or their electoral representatives ’ presence during the process of examination of their signature sheets by those working and/or expert groups, as well as their participation at those commissions ’ meetings concerning the applicants ’ registration. The parties are also requested to submit information concerning the methods of composition and functioning of those working and expert groups, the manner of selection and appointment of their members, as well as information as to those members ’ qualifications.

Case-specific questions

Applications nos. 12563/16 ( Alakbarov ), 12582/16 ( Imanov ), 12623/16 ( Rahimli ), 13073/16 ( Fattayev ), 13078/16 ( Mammadli ), 17282/16 ( Gulami ), 18391/16 ( Samadov ) and 77321/16 ( Karimli ) : Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

Nos.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of Birth

Place of Residence

Nationality

Principal representative

1.

12563/16

Alakbarov v. Azerbaijan

23/02/2016

Nizami Maharram oglu ALAKBAROV

1958Baku

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

2.

12582/16

Imanov v. Azerbaijan

23/02/2016

Iman Ibish oglu IMANOV

1950Fuzuli

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

3.

12623/16

Rahimli v. Azerbaijan

23/02/2016

Mubariz Shamsaddin oglu RAHIMLI

1980Baku

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

4.

13073/16

Fattayev v. Azerbaijan

24/02/2016

Mirmahmud Mirali oglu FATTAYEV

1956Sumgayit

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

5.

13078/16

Mammadli v. Azerbaijan

24/02/2016

Ahad Farhad oglu MAMMADLI

1982Baku

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

6.

17282/16

Gulami v. Azerbaijan

24/03/2016

Tamilla Famil gizi GULAMI

1983Baku

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

7.

18391/16

Samadov v. Azerbaijan

25/03/2016

Parviz Habib oglu SAMADOV

1975Baku

Azerbaijani

Khalid BAGIROV

8.

23979/16

Mehdiyev v. Azerbaijan

18/04/2016

Sarvar Abasgulu oglu MEHDIYEV

1966Baku

Azerbaijani

Samira AGAYEVA

9.

77321/16

Karimli v. Azerbaijan

08/12/2016

Karim Galamshah oglu KARIMLI

1990Baku

Azerbaijani

Samad RAHIMLI

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255