LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
N.A. v. GREECE and 8 other applications
Doc ref: 11216/20;11483/20;15092/20;15470/20;16043/20;19995/20;20974/20;24427/20;36856/20 • ECHR ID: 001-207821
Document date: January 4, 2021
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 4
N.A. v. GREECE and 8 other applications
Doc ref: 11216/20;11483/20;15092/20;15470/20;16043/20;19995/20;20974/20;24427/20;36856/20 • ECHR ID: 001-207821
Document date: January 4, 2021
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 4 January 2021 Published on 25 January 2021
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 11216/20 N.A. against Greece and 8 other applications (see list appended)
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern the living conditions of the applicants, pregnant women at the time of lodging their applications with the Court. They lived either in tents in the forest outside the hotspot, or in a container inside the hotspot. The applicants requested interim measures under Rule 39 of the Court, which were granted.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. Having regard to the fact that the applicants were pregnant at an advanced stage, were their living conditions compatible with Article 3 and/or Article 8 of the Convention? Were the living conditions of the applicants transferred to containers compatible with Article 3 and/or Article 8 of the Convention?
2. In respect of application no. 16043/20, having regard to the measures taken in response to the Court ’ s decisions to indicate interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, was there a hindrance by the State with the effective exercise of the applicant ’ s right of application, ensured by Article 34 of the Convention (see Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, §§ 128-129, ECHR 2005 ‑ I)?
Was there an objective impediment which prevented compliance with the Rule 39 measure granted by the Court? Did the Government take all reasonable steps to remove the impediment and to keep the Court informed of the situation (see Paladi v. Moldova [GC], no. 39806/05, § 92, 10 July 2009, and Rrapo v. Albania, no. 58555/10 , § 75-88, 25 September 2012)?
3 In case 36856/20, did the applicant have an effective remedy for her complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?
APPENDIX
Click here to enter text.
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Represented by
1
11216/20
N.A. v. Greece
27/02/2020
1989Vathy
Jenny FLEISCHER
2
11483/20
Z.R. v. Greece
01/03/2020
1986Vathy
Jenny FLEISCHER
3
15092/20
R.A. v. Greece
24/03/2020
2001Samos
Jenny FLEISCHER
4
15470/20
F.H. v. Greece
30/03/2020
1999Vathy Samos
Ingrid METTON
5
16043/20
F.H. v. Greece
09/04/2020
1994Vathy Samos
Jenny FLEISCHER
6
19995/20
S.I. v. Greece
18/05/2020
1998Vathy Samos
Jenny FLEISCHER
7
20974/20
A.D. v. Greece
27/05/2020
1994Samos
Jenny FLEISCHER
8
24427/20
R.A. v. Greece
23/06/2020
1998Samos
Ingrid METTON
9
36856/20
S.J. v. Greece
23/09/2020
1996Samos
Ingrid METTON
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
