LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
ASANOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 2 other applications
Doc ref: 19137/18;20189/18;30425/18 • ECHR ID: 001-207897
Document date: January 11, 2021
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 4
ASANOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 2 other applications
Doc ref: 19137/18;20189/18;30425/18 • ECHR ID: 001-207897
Document date: January 11, 2021
Cited paragraphs only
Communicated on 11 January 2021 Published on 1 February 2021
FIFTH SECTION
Application no. 19137/18 Vites ASANOVSKI and Others against North Macedonia and 2 other applications (see list appended)
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern border incidents in which the applicants, all Macedonians / citizens of the Republic of North Macedonia of Roma origin, were not allowed to leave the respondent State. The authorities based their decisions on the fact that the applicants had not had sufficient financial means or a return ticket or a formal letter of invitation regarding their country of destination, or, regarding application no. 20189/18, on a travel ban to leave the respondent State (imposed previously in view of a ban to enter the EU for having previously been deported by one of its Member States).
The applicants brought civil actions against the State alleging violation of their right to freedom of movement and the principle of non ‑ discrimination, claiming that they were singled out by the border police officers owing to their Roma origin.
Т he domestic courts ruled in favour only in respect to the applicants in application no. 19137/18 regarding their right to freedom of movement. Their claims for violation of the principle of non-discrimination and compensation were dismissed.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. Do the applicants in application no. 19137/18 have victim status concerning their complaint under Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, given the domestic courts ’ findings in the impugned proceedings ?
2. If so, was the ban placed on all applicants to leave the territory of the respondent State in compliance with Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention?
3. Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention right to leave their country on the grounds of their Roma origin, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 and/or Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4?
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Represented by
1
19137/18
Asanovski v. North Macedonia
18/04/2018
Vites ASANOVSKI
1982Kriva Palanka
Djeljana ASANOVSKA
1980Kumanovo
Stojan ASANOVSKI
1956Kriva Palanka
European Roma Rights Centre
Bojan GJUROVSKI
2
20189/18
Sulimanov v. North Macedonia
18/04/2018
Bedati SULIMANOV
1982Veles
European Roma Rights Centre
3
30425/18
Demirovski v. North Macedonia
22/06/2018
Fazli DEMIROVSKI
1965Berovo
Zharko HADJI-ZAFIROV
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025
