Communicated on 18 January 2021 Published on 8 February 2021

SECOND SECTION

Application no. 10570/18 Halil ERDOÄžAN against Turkey lodged on 1 February 2018

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the non-execution of a final judicial decision awarding the applicant compensation for de facto expropriation of a plot of land which he partially owned .

The applicant complains of a violation of his rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention arguing that despite the Constitutional Court ’ s decisions finding violations for non ‑ execution of domestic decisions in his favour, the decision in question has not been fully executed .

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Has there been a violation of the applicant ’ s right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and his right of peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the authorities ’ alleged failure to fully execute the final judicial decision delivered in the applicant ’ s favour (see Kuzu v. Turkey , no. 13062/03, 17 January 2006; Yerebasmaz v. Turkey , no. 14710/03, 10 October 2006; M. Kaplan v. Turkey , no. 29016/04, 9 December 2008; and Necati Erol v. Turkey , no. 4387/08, 3 November 2011)?

The parties are invited to submit updated and detailed information on the state of execution of the court ’ s judgment.