Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

C., MEDWAY AND BALL AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 7099/75;7699/76;9292/81 • ECHR ID: 001-49254

Document date: January 25, 1985

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

C., MEDWAY AND BALL AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 7099/75;7699/76;9292/81 • ECHR ID: 001-49254

Document date: January 25, 1985

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of

the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),

Having regard to the reports drawn up by the European Commission of

Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention

relating to the applications lodged by MM. C., Andrew George Medway

and Ian Ball against the United Kingdom (Applications Nos. 7099/75,

7699/76 and 9292/81);

Whereas on 21 September 1983 the Commission transmitted the said

reports to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three

months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

convention has elapsed without the cases having been brought before

the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48

(art. 48) of the convention;

Whereas in their applications introduced between 25 May 1975 and

5 November 1980 the applicants complained principally of their

compulsory, indefinite detention in a mental hospital without a

periodic judicial review of its substantive justification, alleging

violation, inter alia, of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the

convention and in the case of "C." invoking Articles 6, paragraph 1,

13 and 14 (art. 6-1, art. 13, art. 14) of the convention;

Whereas the Commission, after having declared the applications

admissible, in its reports adopted on 13 July 1983, having referred to

the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 November 1981

in the case of "X against the United Kingdom", expressed the opinion

by a unanimous vote that there was a violation of Article 5,

paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention and in the case of "C." that

it was not necessary to pursue a further examination of the

applicant's complaint in the light of Articles 13 and 14 (art. 13,

art. 14) of the convention;

Agreeing with the opinions expressed by the Commission in accordance

with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;

Whereas during the examination of these cases, the Committee of

Ministers was informed by the Government of the United Kingdom that it

accepted the Commission's opinions; that the United Kingdom

legislation, as amended subsequent to the judgment of the European

Court of Human Rights in the case of "X against the United Kingdom"

with a view to remedying the deficiency in domestic law found by the

Court, had now entered into force; and that this new legislation

eliminated the circumstances which had given rise to these cases;

Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the convention,

a.      Decides that in these cases there has been a violation of

Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4), of the convention;

b.      Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the

Government of the United Kingdom, that no further action is called for

in these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255