Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

JESSO AGAINST AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 9315/81 • ECHR ID: 001-49268

Document date: February 12, 1987

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

JESSO AGAINST AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 9315/81 • ECHR ID: 001-49268

Document date: February 12, 1987

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of

the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of

Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention

relating to the application lodged by Mr John Jesso against Austria

(Application No. 9315/81);

Whereas on 23 June 1986 the Commission transmitted the said report to

the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months

provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the convention

has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European

Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the

convention;

Whereas, in his application introduced on 8 December 1980, the

applicant complained that the length of certain criminal proceedings

against him was such that he had been denied the determination of

certain criminal charges against him within a reasonable time,

contrary to Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention;

Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on

11 October 1984 and in its report adopted on 7 May 1986 it expressed

unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6,

paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in that the criminal charges

against the applicant had not been determined within a reasonable

time;

Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance

with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the convention;

Having examined the proposals made by the Commission in accordance

with Article 31, paragraph 3 (art. 31-3), of the convention;

Whereas during the examination of this case, the Austrian Government

informed the Committee of Ministers that it accepted the finding of

the violation and was ready to pay in accordance with the proposals

made by the Commission under Article 31, paragraph 3 (art. 31-3), of

the convention the sum of 40 000 FF if the Committee decided there had

been a violation of the convention in this case,

Takes note with satisfaction that, following the decision of the

Committee of Ministers under Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

the convention, the Austrian Government has paid 25 000 FF to the

applicant and 15 000 FF to his lawyers;

Voting in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the convention,

a.      Decides that there has been a violation of Article 6,

paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the convention in this case in that the

criminal charges against the applicant had not been determined within

a reasonable time;

b.      Decides that no further action is called for in this case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846