Search
document

Document text Analytics

KARLSSON AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 12782/87 • ECHR ID: 001-49295

Document date: September 24, 1990

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

KARLSSON AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 12782/87 • ECHR ID: 001-49295

Document date: September 24, 1990

Cited paragraphs only

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32)

of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of

Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention

relating to the application lodged on 12 January 1987 by

Mr Erik Karlsson against Sweden (No. 12782/87);

Whereas on 5 May 1989 the Commission transmitted the said report

to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months

provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention

elapsed without the case having been brought before the European

Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of

the Convention;

Whereas in his application the applicant complained that he had no

possibility of having a dispute over the refusal to grant him a

permit to acquire certain agricultural property examined by a tribunal

satisfying the requirements of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the

Convention;

Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible on

12 October 1988 and in its report adopted on 12 April 1989 unanimously

expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6,

paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;

Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in accordance

with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;

Whereas, during the examination of the case, the Committee of

Ministers was informed by the Government of Sweden that the Act of

21 April 1988 on judicial review of certain administrative decisions,

which provides for a possibility of review by the Supreme

Administrative Court, will be applicable to the situation complained

of in this case;

Having examined the proposals made by the Commission concerning just

satisfaction for the applicant,

Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of

Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there has

been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the

Convention in this case;

Takes note of the information provided by the Government of Sweden;

Recommends, under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of

Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention,

that the Government of Sweden pay to the applicant the sum of

10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of non-pecuniary damage and the

sum of 2 500 Swedish crowns for costs and expenses;

Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in this

case.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant