Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

HEWITT, HARMAN AND N. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 12175/86;12327/86 • ECHR ID: 001-49300

Document date: December 13, 1990

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

HEWITT, HARMAN AND N. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 12175/86;12327/86 • ECHR ID: 001-49300

Document date: December 13, 1990

Cited paragraphs only



The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

(hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the reports drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights

in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the

applications lodged on 4 September 1985 by Ms Patricia Hope Hewitt and

Ms Harriet Harman against the United Kingdom (Application No. 12175/86) and on

17 April 1986 by N. against the United Kingdom (Application No. 12327/86);

Whereas on 20 June 1989 and 12 June 1989 the Commission transmitted the said

reports to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months

provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention elapsed

without the cases having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights

in pursuance of Article 48 of the Convention;

Whereas in their application the applicants Ms Hewitt and Ms Harman complained

of their secret surveillance by the Security Service and the consequent

gathering and storing of information about them and in his application the

applicant N. complained that he had been subjected to the obtaining, retention

and use of information about himself;

Whereas the Commission declared the applications admissible on 12 May 1988 and

11 October 1988 and in its reports adopted on 9 May 1989 expressed the opinion,

by thirteen votes to two in the case of Ms Hewitt and Ms Harman and by fourteen

votes to one in the case of N., that there had been a violation of Article 8

(art. 8) of the Convention and of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 8

(art. 13+8) of the Convention;

Agreeing with the opinions expressed by the Commission in accordance with

Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the Convention;

Whereas, during the examination of the cases, the Committee of Ministers was

informed by the Government of the United Kingdom that the Security Service  Act

1989 came into force on 18 December 1989.  The Act places the Security Service

on a statutory basis, defines the purposes for which its activities may be

carried out and establishes a Security Service commissioner and an independant

tribunal for the investigation of complaints about the service.  The Committee

was also informed that an agreement had been reached between the applicants and

the United Kingdom authorities according to which the applicants Ms Hewitt and

Ms Harman would receive the sum of £ 4 365 and the applicant N. the sum

of £ 1 925 in respect of their legal costs,

Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32,

paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there has been a violation of

Article 8 and of Article 13 (art. 8, art. 13) of the Convention in these cases;

Takes note of the information provided by the Government of the United

Kingdom;

Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255