Search
document

Document text Analytics

L. AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 12585/86 • ECHR ID: 001-49320

Document date: December 13, 1991

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

L. AGAINST SWEDEN

Doc ref: 12585/86 • ECHR ID: 001-49320

Document date: December 13, 1991

Cited paragraphs only

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the

Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31

(art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged

on 28 October 1986 by Mrs L. against Sweden (Application

No. 12585/86);

Whereas on 9 August 1990 the Commission transmitted the said

report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of

three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1),

of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been

brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance

of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;

Whereas in her application the applicant complained that she

had no possibility of having a dispute over the refusal to grant

buyers a permit to acquire her agricultural property examined by

a tribunal satisfying the requirements of Article 6,

paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;

Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible

on 13 April 1989 and in its report adopted on 3 July 1990

unanimously expressed the opinion that there had been a violation

of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention but not

of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) to the Convention;

Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in

accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the

Convention;

Whereas, during the examination of the case, the Committee

of Ministers was informed by the Government of Sweden that the

Act of 21 April 1988 on judicial review of certain administrative

decisions, which provides for a possibility of review by the

Supreme Administrative Court, will be applicable to the situation

complained of in this case;

Having examined the proposals made by the Commission when

transmitting its report concerning just satisfaction for the

applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President

of the Commission dated 7 June 1991,

Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of

Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that

there has been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1),

of the Convention but not of Article 1 of Protocol No 1 (P1-1)

to the Convention in this case;

Takes note of the information provided by the Government of

Sweden;

Having recommended, at the 462nd meeting of the Ministers'

Deputies (27 September 1991), under Rule 5 of the Rules adopted

by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of Sweden pay

to the applicant the sum of 10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of

non-pecuniary damage and the sum of 24 400 Swedish crowns for

costs and expenses,

Decides, therefore, that no further action is called for in

this case.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant