Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD AND ANDREW NEIL AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 14644/89 • ECHR ID: 001-49329

Document date: May 15, 1992

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD AND ANDREW NEIL AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 14644/89 • ECHR ID: 001-49329

Document date: May 15, 1992

Cited paragraphs only



     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32

(art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the

Convention"),

     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European

Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31

(art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged

on 2 February 1989  by Times Newspapers Ltd and Andrew Neil

against the United Kingdom (Application No.14644/89);

     Whereas on 19 November 1991 the Commission transmitted the

said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period

of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1

(art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case

having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in

pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;

     Whereas in their application the applicants complained that

a judgment of the House of Lords required them to pay partial

costs and to account to the Attorney General for any profits made

from their publication of an extract from a book written by a

former agent of the security service;

     Whereas the Commission declared the application admissible

on 11 April 1991 and in its report adopted on 8 October 1991

expressed the opinion by eleven votes to three that there had

been no violation of Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention and

unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 13 nor

of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 10 (art. 13+10,

art. 14+10) of the Convention;

     Agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission in

accordance with Article 31, paragraph 1 (art. 31-1), of the

Convention,

     Decides, having voted in accordance with the provisions of

Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that

there has been no violation of Articles 10, 13 and 14 (art. 10,

art. 13, art. 14) of the Convention in this case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255