CASE OF S. AGAINST SWITZERLAND
Doc ref: 12629/87;13965/88 • ECHR ID: 001-55529
Document date: May 15, 1992
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54
(art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the
Convention"),
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human
Rights in the case of S. against Switzerland delivered on
28 November 1991 and transmitted the same day to the Committee
of Ministers;
Recalling that the case originated in two applications
against Switzerland lodged with the European Commission of Human
Rights on 18 November 1986 and 28 May 1988 under Article 25
(art. 25) of the Convention by Mr S., a Swiss national, who
complained of restrictions on free communication with his lawyer
while remanded in custody;
Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the
Commission on 8 October 1990 and by the Government of Switzerland
on 12 December 1990;
Whereas in its judgment of 28 November 1991 the Court
unanimously:
- held that there had been a violation of paragraph 3.c
of Article 6 (art. 6-3-c);
- held that it was not necessary to examine the case
from the point of view of paragraph 3.b of Article 6
(art. 6-3-b), or of Article 5, paragraph 4 (art. 5-4);
- held that the respondent State was to pay the
applicant within three months 2 500 Swiss francs for
non-pecuniary damage and 12 500 Swiss francs for costs
and expenses;
- dismissed the remainder of the claim for just
satisfaction;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of
Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of
the Convention;
Having invited the Government of Switzerland to inform it
of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the
judgment of 28 November 1991, having regard to its obligation
under Article 53 (art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;
Having satisfied itself that the Government of Switzerland
has paid the applicant on 28 January 1992 the sums provided for
in the judgment of 28 November 1991,
Declares that it has exercised its functions under
Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
