CASE OF BEN YAACOUB AGAINST BELGIUM
Doc ref: 9976/82 • ECHR ID: 001-55552
Document date: November 10, 1992
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54
(art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the
Convention"),
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human
Rights in the Ben Yaacoub case, delivered on 27 November 1987 and
transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;
Recalling that the case originated in an application against
the Kingdom of Belgium lodged with the European Commission of
Human Rights on 30 June 1982 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the
Convention by Mr Borhane Ben Yaacoub, a Tunisian citizen, who
alleged that criminal charges against him had not been heard by
an "impartial tribunal" within the meaning of Article 6,
paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;
Recalling that the Commission declared the application
admissible on 4 May 1983 and in its report adopted on 7 May 1985
expressed the opinion, by six votes to four, that the applicant's
case had not been heard by an "impartial tribunal" within the
meaning of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention
and that there had been, therefore, a breach of that provision;
Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the
Commission on 11 July 1985;
Whereas in its judgment of 27 November 1987 the Court,
having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the
Government of Belgium and the applicant and having satisfied
itself that there were no reasons of public policy (ordre public)
necessitating the continuation of the proceedings, decided
unanimously to strike the case out of its list;
Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was
agreed that:
- the Belgian Government would lift, with effect from
30 August 1992, the effects of an expulsion order made
against Mr Ben Yaacoub;
- prior to that date, any request for safe-conduct
enabling him to enter Belgium would be examined,
provided that it was based on valid reasons and was
supported by appropriate evidence;
- the Government would pay to the applicant 100 000
Belgian francs by way of agreed damages;
- the costs and fees occasioned by both the appeal on
points of law and the proceedings before the
Convention institutions would be refunded in the
amount of 200 000 Belgian francs;
Recalling that Rule 48, paragraph 3, of the Court's Rules
provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by
means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the
Committee of Ministers in order to allow it to supervise, in
accordance with Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention, the
execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the
discontinuance or solution of the matter;
Having invited the Government of Belgium to inform it of the
measures taken for the execution of the undertakings attached to
the solution of the case;
Recalling that, after having taken note of the information
supplied by the Government of Belgium, the Committee of Ministers
adopted, on 29 September 1988, interim Resolution DH(88)13 on
this case;
Having been informed by the Government of Belgium that in
accordance with the terms of the friendly settlement concluded
in 1987, the expulsion order against the applicant was lifted on
30 August 1992,
Declares, after having taken note of the supplementary
information supplied by the Government of Belgium, that it has
exercised its functions under Article 54 (art. 54) of the
Convention in this case.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
