Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF IDROCALCE S.R.L. v. ITALY

Doc ref: 12088/86 • ECHR ID: 001-55656

Document date: December 15, 1995

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF IDROCALCE S.R.L. v. ITALY

Doc ref: 12088/86 • ECHR ID: 001-55656

Document date: December 15, 1995

Cited paragraphs only

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 54

(art. 54) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and

Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human

Rights in the Idrocalce S.r.l. case delivered on 27 February 1992

and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;

Recalling that the case originated in an application

(No. 12088/86) against Italy, lodged with the European Commission

of Human Rights on 1 April 1986 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the

Convention by the company Idrocalce S.r.l., and that the Commission

declared admissible the complaint concerning the excessive length

of certain civil proceedings;

Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the

Commission on 8 March 1991;

Whereas in its judgment of 27 February 1992 the Court

unanimously:

- held that there had been a violation of Article 6,

paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;

- held that this judgment constituted in itself, as regards

any non-pecuniary damage, sufficient just satisfaction for the

purposes of Article 50 (art. 50);

- held that the respondent state was to pay the applicant

company, within three months, 8 040 000 Italian lire for costs and

expenses;

- dismissed the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction;

Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of

Ministers concerning the application of Article 54 (art. 54) of the

Convention;

Having invited the Government of Italy to inform it of the

measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of

27 February 1992, having regard to its obligation under Article 53

(art. 53) of the Convention to abide by it;

Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had

already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found

in this case, through notably the entry into force on 30 April and

1 May 1995 of two laws restructuring the civil courts and speeding

up the proceedings in civil cases (see Resolution DH (95) 82 in the

case of Zanghì against Italy);

Having satisfied itself that on 24 December 1992 the

Government of Italy paid the applicant company the sum provided for

in the judgment of 27 February 1992,

Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied

by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions

under Article 54 (art. 54) of the Convention in this case.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant