RESOLUTION DH (97) 572 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 17502/90 VILLANI SIMONA AGAINST ITALY

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 December 1997 at the 610th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),

Having regard to the report drawn up on 30 November 1994, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 16 November 1990 by Ms Simona Villani against Italy (Application No. 17502/90);

Whereas on 11 January 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 of the Convention;

Whereas in her application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 29 June 1994, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;

Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention;

Whereas, at the 539th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and agreed with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, by decision adopted on 7 June 1995, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention;

Whereas the Committee of Ministers examined the proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 12 April 1995;

Whereas, at the 597th meeting of the Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission's proposals, held, by decision adopted on 11 July 1997, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the Government of Italy was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 6 000 000 Italian lire in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 2 000 000 Italian lire in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 8 000 000 Italian lire, and that interest should be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated on the basis of each full elapsed month of delay (in accordance with the decision adopted by the Committee of Ministers at its 599th meeting (17 September 1997) on the general principles regarding the payment of default interest) at the statutory rate applicable on the date of this decision, it being understood that the interest would accrue from the expiry of the time- limit until full payment was placed at the disposal of the applicant;

Whereas the Committee of Ministers invited the Government of Italy to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 7 June 1995 and 11 July 1997, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 32, paragraph 4, of the Convention to abide by them;

Whereas, during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of Italy accordingly recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, notably through the adoption on 24 October 1989 of the new Code of Criminal Proceedure (see inter alia Resolution DH (92) 54 in the case of Frau against Italy and Resolution DH (94) 15 in the case of Sanfilippo against Italy), and that the Commission's report as well as the Committee of Ministers' decisions had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned;

Whereas the Committee of Ministers satisfied itself that on 23 September 1997, within the time-limit set, the Government of Italy paid the applicant the total sum of 8 000 000 Italian lire as just satisfaction, Declares, having taken note of the measures taken by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions under Article 32 of the Convention in this case;

Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case.