Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE POWER-FORDE
CASE OF SALDUZ v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY , JOINED BY JUDGES CASADEVALL AND TÃœRMEN
CASE OF ODDONE AND PECCI v. SAN MARINOCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF SOMMERFELD v. GERMANYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAJIĆ
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ, KARAKAŞ AND TSOTSORIA, JOINED IN PART BY JUDGE STEINER
CASE OF CALOC v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GREVE
CASE OF P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TULKENS
BARAONA CASE
CASE OF ZAWADKA v. POLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S B ÃŽ RSAN, GARLICKI AND MYJER
CASE OF SILVA PONTES v. PORTUGALDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF PERKINS AND R. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 43208/98;44875/98 • ECHR ID: 001-56265

Document date: July 22, 2003

Inbound citations: 22
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

DD unique documents citing • gk citations total to e paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846