Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF EON v. FRANCE [Extracts]PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PEJCHAL
Commission Regulation (EC) No 270/2009 of 2 April 2009 concerning the authorisation of 6-phytase as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation DSM Nutritional Products Ltd represented by DSM Nutritional products Sp. Z o.o.) (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLICCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPANO
Commission Directive 2002/37/EC of 3 May 2002 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include ethofumesate as an active substance (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF BITTON v. FRANCE (No. 2)
CASE OF KÖYLÜOĞLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF WALDNER v. CYPRUS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 969/2002 of 6 June 2002 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
CASE OF ERGÜN v. TURKEY
CASE OF S.T.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS AGAINST GREECE

Doc ref: 18748/91 • ECHR ID: 001-71137

Document date: October 26, 2005

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 2

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

r unique documents citing • H citations total to f paragraphs

Outbound citations

a unique documents cited • J citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846