Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CSEPYOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 971/2006 of 29 June 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 2375/2002 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for common wheat of a quality other than high quality from third countries
CASE OF V. v. FINLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 45/2005 of 13 January 2005 fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3685/81 of 15 December 1981 amending for the fourth time Regulation (EEC) No 355/79 laying down general rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1731/2006 of 23 November 2006 on special detailed rules for the application of export refunds in the case of certain preserved beef and veal products
CASE OF X v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM25/10/2002 CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE COSTA
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANZONI
CASE OF ORŠUŠ AND OTHERS AGAINST CROATIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF WODITSCHKA AND WILFING, LADNER, H.G. AND G.B., WOLFMEYER, AND R.H. AGAINST AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 69756/01;18297/03;11084/02;5263/03;7336/03 • ECHR ID: 001-97134

Document date: December 3, 2009

Inbound citations: 16
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

A unique documents citing • Dz citations total to 1 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846