Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2221/95 of 20 September 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 as regards physical checks carried out at the time of export of agricultural products qualifying for refunds
CASE OF ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MALINVERNI , JOINED BY JUDGES ROZAKIS AND SPIELMANN
CASE OF DULAŞ v. TURKEY
Commission Directive 2000/66/EC of 23 October 2000 including an active substance (triasulfuron) in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market

Document text Analytics

CASES OF DOROZHKO AND POZHARSKIY AGAINST ESTONIA

Doc ref: 14659/04;16855/04 • ECHR ID: 001-103822

Document date: December 2, 2010

Inbound citations: 42
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

sY unique documents citing • kY citations total to U paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846