Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF GASHI AND 7 OTHER CASES AGAINST CROATIA

Doc ref: 32457/05;29182/03;18421/05;71615/01;17117/06;9204/04;34499/06;32668/02 • ECHR ID: 001-106853

Document date: September 14, 2011

  • Inbound citations: 127
  • Cited paragraphs: 2
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF GASHI AND 7 OTHER CASES AGAINST CROATIA

Doc ref: 32457/05;29182/03;18421/05;71615/01;17117/06;9204/04;34499/06;32668/02 • ECHR ID: 001-106853

Document date: September 14, 2011

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH (2011)97 [1]

Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights:

8 cases against Croatia

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”) [2] ,

Having regard to the judgments listed below, transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;

Case name (App. No.)

Judgment of

Final on

Decision to close

Gashi (32457/05)

09/10/2008

09/01/2009

1059 meeting

June 2009

Kozlica (29182/03)

02/11/2006

02/02/2007

1007 meeting

October 2007

Lesnina D.D. (18421/05)

25/10/2007

31/03/2008

1043 meeting

December 2008

Mežnarić (71615/01)

15/07/2005

30/11/2005

992 meeting

April 2007

Nikolac (17117/06)

10/07/2008

01/12/2008

1059 meeting

June 2009

Nogolica (No. 3) (9204/04)

07/12/2006

07/03/2007

1028 meeting

June 2008

Perić (34499/06)

27/03/2008

27/06/2008

1059 meeting

June 2009

Uljar and others (32668/02)

08/03/2007

08/06/2007

1013 meeting

December 2007

Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of individual measures to put an end to the violations and as far as possible to remedy their consequences for the applicant and general measures to prevent new, similar violations;

Having invited the authorities of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to execute each of the judgments listed in the table above;

Having, in accordance with the Committee ’ s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, examined the information provided for each case provided by the authorities of the respondent state;

Having noted that the respondent state paid the a p plicant the just satisfaction, as provided in the judgments;

DECLARES that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and DECIDES t o close the examination thereof.

[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies

[2] See also the Recommendations adopted by the Committee of Ministers in the context of the supervision of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and in particular Recommendation Rec (2004)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the improvement of domestic remedies.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255