CASE OF GASHI AND 7 OTHER CASES AGAINST CROATIA
Doc ref: 32457/05;29182/03;18421/05;71615/01;17117/06;9204/04;34499/06;32668/02 • ECHR ID: 001-106853
Document date: September 14, 2011
- Inbound citations: 127
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 2
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2011)97 [1]
Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights:
8 cases against Croatia
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”) [2] ,
Having regard to the judgments listed below, transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;
Case name (App. No.)
Judgment of
Final on
Decision to close
Gashi (32457/05)
09/10/2008
09/01/2009
1059 meeting
June 2009
Kozlica (29182/03)
02/11/2006
02/02/2007
1007 meeting
October 2007
Lesnina D.D. (18421/05)
25/10/2007
31/03/2008
Loading citations...1043 meeting
December 2008
Mežnarić (71615/01)
15/07/2005
30/11/2005
992 meeting
April 2007
Nikolac (17117/06)
10/07/2008
01/12/2008
1059 meeting
June 2009
Nogolica (No. 3) (9204/04)
07/12/2006
07/03/2007
1028 meeting
June 2008
Perić (34499/06)
27/03/2008
27/06/2008
1059 meeting
June 2009
Uljar and others (32668/02)
08/03/2007
08/06/2007
1013 meeting
December 2007
Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of individual measures to put an end to the violations and as far as possible to remedy their consequences for the applicant and general measures to prevent new, similar violations;
Having invited the authorities of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to execute each of the judgments listed in the table above;
Having, in accordance with the Committee ’ s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, examined the information provided for each case provided by the authorities of the respondent state;
Having noted that the respondent state paid the a p plicant the just satisfaction, as provided in the judgments;
DECLARES that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and DECIDES t o close the examination thereof.
[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2011 at the 1120th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies
[2] See also the Recommendations adopted by the Committee of Ministers in the context of the supervision of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and in particular Recommendation Rec (2004)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the improvement of domestic remedies.