CASE OF KANGASLUOMA AND 34 OTHER CASES AGAINST FINLAND
Doc ref: 48339/99, 23667/06, 2511/02, 24732/06, 4799/03, 36288/97, 33173/05, 39509/08, 39105/05, 64436/01, 56... • ECHR ID: 001-111919
Document date: June 6, 2012
- Inbound citations: 113
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 12
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2012)75 [1]
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
35 cases against Finland
Loading citations...Application
Case
Judgment of
Final on
48339/99
KANGASLUOMA
20/01/2004
14/06/2004
23667/06
AHLSKOG RAFAEL
13/11/2008
13/02/2009
2511/02
AHO
16/10/2007
16/01/2008
24732/06
AIMINEN
15/09/2009
15/12/2009
4799/03
ELORANTA
09/12/2008
09/03/2009
36288/97
FRYCKMAN
10/10/2006
10/01/2007
33173/05
G.
27/01/2009
27/04/2009
39509/08
HORSTI
10/11/2009
10/02/2010
39105/05
JAANTI
24/02/2009
24/05/2009
64436/01
KAJAS
07/03/2006
07/06/2006
5635/09
KALLE KANGASLUOMA
15/02/2011
17889/07
LANDGREN
10/11/2009
10/02/2010
22175/06
LAPPALAINEN
03/11/2009
03/02/2010
34147/96
LEHTINEN
13/09/2005
13/12/2005
41585/98
LEHTINEN NO. 2
08/06/2006
08/09/2006
43160/98
LEHTINEN TOIVE
22/05/2007
22/08/2007
45618/04
LEHTINEN TOIVE NO. 2
31/03/2009
30/06/2009
11704/03
LEHTONEN
13/06/2006
13/09/2006
28631/05
MANNINEN
14/04/2009
14/07/2009
77138/01
MATTILA
23/05/2006
23/08/2006
10615/03
MOLANDER
07/11/2006
07/02/2007
13102/03
NARINEN No . 2
06/03/2007
06/06/2007
16385/07
NIEMINEN
03/11/2009
03/02/2010
45952/08
NOUSIAINEN
23/02/2010
23/05/2010
38158/07
OY HOPOTIHOI SUOMEN LELUKAMARIT TOY & HOBBY LTD AND MATTI KANGASLUOMA
22/09/2009
22/12/2009
26189/06
PETIKON OY AND PARVIAINEN
27/01/2009
17/02/2009
31021/06
PETROFF
03/11/2009
03/02/2010
23172/08
RANGDELL
19/01/2010
19/04/2010
25072/02
RIIHIKALLIO AND OTHERS
31/05/2007
12/11/2007
66899/01
RUOHO
13/12/2005
13/03/2006
45981/08
SEPPÄLA
11/01/2011
38581/97
T.K. AND S.E.
31/05/2005
31/08/2005
61222/00
UOTI
09/01/2007
13/01/2009
09/04/2007
13/04/2009
10736/03
VÄÄNÄNEN
22/05/2007
24/09/2007
36989/05
VIENONEN AND OTHERS
24/03/2009
24/06/2009
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in the above cases and to the violations established (see document DH-DD(2012)508E );
Recalling that the respondent State ’ s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide to by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its above mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2012)508E );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;
DECLARES that it has exe r cised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
ACTION REPORT
ON THE EXECUTION OF THE JUDGEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Respondent State
Finland
Application no.
48339/99
Name
Kangasluoma
Judgement
20/01/2004
Final
14/06/2004
Violation of the Convention
Article 6 § 1
Excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings. Article 13
Absence of an effective remedy in that respect.
Type
Leading case.
Kangasluoma and 36 other cases concern the excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings (violations of Article 6 § 1).
Several cases also concern the absence of an effective remedy enabling the applicants to complain about the length of the proceedings (violations of Article 13).
Individual measures
Just satisfaction
Other measures
General Measures
Article 6(1)
Article 13
Legislative measures
Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights
Domestic Judicial Practice
Publication and dissemination
Conclusions of the Government
The measures adopted are capable of preventing similar violations. Finland has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 June 2012 at the 11 44 th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies .