Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELÓSEGUI
CASE OF MASLÁK AND MICHÁLKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF PAULA CONSTANTINESCU v. ROMANIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1781/89 of 21 June 1989 issuing a standing invitation to tender for the sale, for use within the Community, of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies
CASE OF DAVLETKHANOV AND OTHER “CHERNOBYL PENSIONERS” CASES v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ŽIBRAT AGAINST CROATIA
CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON
CASE OF KIPS DOO AND DREKALOVIĆ v. MONTENEGRO
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1932/2004 of 8 November 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream

Document text Analytics

CASE OF POSTOLACHE AGAINST ROMANIA (No. 2) AND CASE OF SC MAROLUX SRL AND JACOBS AGAINST ROMANIA

Doc ref: 48269/08;29419/02 • ECHR ID: 001-116564

Document date: December 6, 2012

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

k unique documents citing • Q citations total to f paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846