Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DIAMANTE AND PELLICCIONI v. SAN MARINODISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE
CASE OF TATISHVILI AGAINST RUSSIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 11/2009 of 7 January 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1347/2008 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 January 2009
CASE OF DRIDI AGAINST GERMANY
CASE OF IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ZEKIA
DJOKABA LAMBI LONGA v. THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 220/2005 of 10 February 2005 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for preserved mushrooms from 1 January 2005
CASE OF INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3976/87 of 14 December 1987 on the application of Article 85 (3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices in the air transport sector
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JU D GES KARAKAŞ, VUČINIĆ AND KŪRIS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SZULUK AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Doc ref: 36936/05 • ECHR ID: 001-121962

Document date: May 7, 2013

Inbound citations: 6
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

g unique documents citing • X citations total to 0 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846