Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SVITLANA ATAMANYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 56/2003 of 13 January 2003 on the issuing of system A3 export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector
CASE OF SHEVANOVA v. LATVIAPARTLY CONCURR ING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
CASE OF M v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ALEKSEY OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 of 15 October 2001 on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF ODDONE AND PECCI v. SAN MARINO
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
Commission Directive 2005/72/EC of 21 October 2005 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, mancozeb, maneb, and metiram as active substances (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF AKIF HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

Document text Analytics

CASE OF BAR-BAU SP. Z O. O. AGAINST POLAND

Doc ref: 11656/08 • ECHR ID: 001-140672

Document date: December 5, 2013

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846