Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF DİKEL AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY

Doc ref: 8543/05;45874/05;21316/05;35164/05;9548/06;16231/06;4890/08 • ECHR ID: 001-147759

Document date: September 10, 2014

Inbound citations: 16
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF DİKEL AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST TURKEY

Doc ref: 8543/05;45874/05;21316/05;35164/05;9548/06;16231/06;4890/08 • ECHR ID: 001-147759

Document date: September 10, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ ResDH ( 2014) 124

Execution of the judgment s of the European Court of Human Rights Six cases against Turkey

Application

Case

Judgment of

Final on

8543/05

DIKEL

29/09/2009

29/12/2009

45874/05

KARAYIÄžIT YAVUZ SELIM

27/10/2009

27/01/2010

21316/05

BIÇER

08/06/2010

08/09/2010

35164/05

ABDULLAH YILDIZ

26/04/2011

26/07/2011

9548/06

ARSLANTAY

14/12/2010

14/03/2011

16231/06+

YILMAZ AND ZABUN

12/10/2010

21/02/2011

( Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 September 2014

at the 1206th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies )

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in the above cases and to the violation s established;

Recalling that the respondent State’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide to by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment s including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2014)664 );

Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and;

DECIDES to close their examination thereof.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant