CASE OF LELAS AND 1 OTHER CASE AGAINST CROATIA
Doc ref: 55555/08;38767/07 • ECHR ID: 001-148743
Document date: November 19, 2014
- 40 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Resolution CM/ ResDH ( 2014) 230
Execution of the judgment s of the European Court of Human Rights in Two cases against Croatia
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
55555/08
LELAS
20/05/2010
20/08/2010
38767/07
ŠARIĆ AND OTHERS
18/10/2011
18/01/2012
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 2014
at the 1212th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in the above cases and to the violation s established ;
Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment s including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2012)1042 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted ,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.