CASE OF LADENT AND 4 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
Doc ref: 11036/03;7337/05;16761/07;54727/08;69398/11 • ECHR ID: 001-161706
Document date: March 8, 2016
- Inbound citations: 66
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 1
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2016) 32 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Five cases against Poland
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
11036/03
LADENT
18/03/2008
Loading citations...18/06/2008
7337/05
PIOTR NOWAK
07/12/2010
11/04/2011
16761/07
MAMEŁKA
17/04/2012
17/07/2012
54727/08
WEREDA
26/11/2013
26/02/2014
69398/11
EL KASHIF
19/11/2013
14/04/2014
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 March 2016 at the 1250th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)136 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.