Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY dissenting, PARTLY concurring OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER joined by judgeS lopes rocha and casadevall
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 77/89 of 13 January 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1787/87 introducing the buying-in of beef in respect of certain Member States and qualities and fixing the buying-in prices for beef
CASE OF PAR AND HYODO v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ, KARAKAŞ AND TSOTSORIA, JOINED IN PART BY JUDGE STEINER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1496/97 of 29 July 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector
CASE OF TUNÇ v. TURKEY
CASE OF WĘGRZYN v. POLAND
2002/933/EC: Commission Decision of 28 November 2002 amending Decision 2002/69/EC concerning certain protective measures with regard to the products of animal origin imported from China (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 4583)
CASE OF ALP AGAINST TURKEY
Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC]

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOROBOV AND OTHERS AGAINST ESTONIA

Doc ref: 10195/08 • ECHR ID: 001-163600

Document date: May 25, 2016

Inbound citations: 6
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

e unique documents citing • 3 citations total to W paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846