CASE OF KORMOŠ AND 5 OTHER CASES AGAINST SLOVAKIA
Doc ref: 46092/06;33937/06;50903/06;64195/10;25416/07;7711/06 • ECHR ID: 001-167261
Document date: September 14, 2016
- Inbound citations: 53
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ ResDH (2016)233 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Six cases against the Slovak Republic
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
46092/06
KORMOÅ
08/11/2011
08/03/2012
33937/06
BRUNCKO
03/11/2011
03/02/2012
50903/06
KOVÁČIK
29/11/2011
29/02/2012
64195/10
PETROV
02/12/2014
02/03/2015
25416/07
WINKLER
17/07/2012
17/10/2012
7711/06
ŽÚBOR
06/12/2011
03/02/2012
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 September 2016 at the 1264 th meeting of the Ministers ’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established ,
Recalling the respondent State ’ s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)787 );
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.