Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF ZDRAVKO STANEV AGAINST BULGARIA (No. 2) AND 2 OTHER CASES
CASE OF BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Council Regulation (EEC) No 832/92 of 30 March 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 790/89 fixing the level of additional flat-rate aid for the formation of producers' organizations and the maximum amount applied to aid for quality and marketing improvement in the nut- and locust bean-growing sector
CASE OF KRASUSKI v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
CASE OF FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF MILJEVIĆ v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE PASTOR VILANOVA
CASE OF FÜRST-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WOJTYCZEK AND KŪRIS
H.F. v. THE NETHERLANDS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KRISTIANSEN AGAINST NORWAY

Doc ref: 1176/10 • ECHR ID: 001-171296

Document date: February 1, 2017

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

B unique documents citing • c citations total to 1 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846