Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. AUSTRIA (No. 3)
CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KALAYDJIEVA
CASE OF CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SITAROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FLOGAITIS
CASE OF SOMMERFELD v. GERMANYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAJIĆ
CASE OF PASCU AND OTHERS AND 10 OTHER CASES AGAINST ROMANIA
CASE OF ÇIRAKLAR v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOPES ROCHA
CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SILVIS
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 162/90 of 23 January 1990 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2645/92 of 11 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 determining Community methods for the analysis of wines

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FAKAILO (SAFOKA) AND OTHERS AGAINST FRANCE

Doc ref: 2871/11 • ECHR ID: 001-182006

Document date: March 15, 2018

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

e unique documents citing • X citations total to T paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846